Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Katyal tweets about the appeal [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(179,723 posts)20. Justice Dept. asks appeals court to restore access to Trump raid documents
This is a well done brief. I like the concept of limiting to an emergency stay on the key issue of the 100 records marked classified.
Link to tweet
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/16/justice-dept-asks-appeals-court-to-restore-access-to-trump-raid-documents-00057329
The Justice Department has asked a federal appeals court to lift a judges order blocking criminal investigators from accessing about 100 documents with national security classification markings recovered from former President Donald Trumps Mar-a-Lago compound last month.
In a filing with the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta Friday night, prosecutors said the government is facing irreparable harm as a result of U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannons ruling putting the potentially classified records off-limits to the investigative team until an outside expert conducts a review of them and considers Trumps objections to their seizure.
The courts order hamstrings that investigation and places the FBI and Department of Justice under a Damoclean threat of contempt, DOJ lawyers said in their 29-page filing, adding, It also irreparably harms the government by enjoining critical steps of an ongoing criminal investigation and needlessly compelling disclosure of highly sensitive records, including to [Trumps] counsel.
The Justice Departments widely expected escalation of the legal fight came one day after the Trump-appointed judge rebuffed prosecutors request for a stay that would essentially carve out the national security-related records some bearing markings such as Top Secret/SCI from the outside oversight Trumps legal team requested.
The filing was an unsparing rejection of Cannons handling of the entire matter, saying it has jeopardized national security, is based on flimsy or baseless interpretations of executive privilege and could enable further obstruction of efforts to recover additional missing documents.
In a filing with the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta Friday night, prosecutors said the government is facing irreparable harm as a result of U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannons ruling putting the potentially classified records off-limits to the investigative team until an outside expert conducts a review of them and considers Trumps objections to their seizure.
The courts order hamstrings that investigation and places the FBI and Department of Justice under a Damoclean threat of contempt, DOJ lawyers said in their 29-page filing, adding, It also irreparably harms the government by enjoining critical steps of an ongoing criminal investigation and needlessly compelling disclosure of highly sensitive records, including to [Trumps] counsel.
The Justice Departments widely expected escalation of the legal fight came one day after the Trump-appointed judge rebuffed prosecutors request for a stay that would essentially carve out the national security-related records some bearing markings such as Top Secret/SCI from the outside oversight Trumps legal team requested.
The filing was an unsparing rejection of Cannons handling of the entire matter, saying it has jeopardized national security, is based on flimsy or baseless interpretations of executive privilege and could enable further obstruction of efforts to recover additional missing documents.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think she may have considered (with or without any overt ex parte discussions)..
hlthe2b
Sep 2022
#22
Why would she write such a uniformly ridiculous crap opiinion? Because she's playing to an audience
hlthe2b
Sep 2022
#31
Interesting speculation. Wonder if we'll ever find out. probably not, unless it was leaked somehow.
msfiddlestix
Sep 2022
#24
Yup. If she says an ex-president retains the right to claim executive privilege,
Ocelot II
Sep 2022
#37
Justice Dept. asks appeals court to restore access to Trump raid documents
LetMyPeopleVote
Sep 2022
#20