Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,674 posts)
73. The directive does not change anything the pollworkers are doing.
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 12:13 PM
Nov 2012

The form has been used since the first day of early voting. The directive is to the Boards of Election and applies only to reviewing affirmations which were not properly marked. The exact same instruction is on the form the voters fill out (it tells voters that if they don't provide the number associated with the two most common forms of ID AND they don't check a box or fill out a different form AND they don't show back up at the BOE within 10 days their vote won't be counted). All the directive does is require the BOE to follow the directions that are printed on the form when they review them. (Those directions are, in my opinion, legally incorrect - and that issue is being litigated.)

You said you were concerned that the directive subverted "the whole point of a PROVISIONAL ballot in the first place {which was} to preserve the intended vote in a form that it can be counted once there is a judgment as to its validity." That is the difference between a directive to put them in a shredder (not part of this directive) and to count them incorrectly (which is part of this directive).

The lawsuit is over how the review is conducted (based on the directive) - meanwhile, the purpose you articulated for provisional ballots is being carried out- the vote is preserved.

I think the Obama team is legally correct, and will ultimately win. I'm not arguing about the principle - just that there is no destruction of ballots ordered -and that the practical impact is likely to be very small (most people put a SS# or Driver's license number on the form - and if they do, this directive has no impact on them). In addition there are observers in most precincts in Ohio who are instructed to ask to be notified whenever a provisional ballot is issued who can watch to make sure a box is checked. I will be very surprised if an injunction related to poll workers is issued based on litigation requesting clarification on which provisional ballots are to be counted.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Law, schmaw. This is Ohio. Jackpine Radical Nov 2012 #1
At first glance, this looks pretty bad. Anyone have any experience yet with this? riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #2
Supposedly the idea is to eliminate poll worker errors as the cause for throwing out the ballot Maeve Nov 2012 #26
I actually don't see this as impacting much. Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #48
That guy just doesn't stop, does he? LisaL Nov 2012 #3
Not until he's rotting in jail... HooptieWagon Nov 2012 #5
And order the bailiff to throw Husted in jail for a minimum of 364 days. Panasonic Nov 2012 #61
He will reject them all because the ink was too dark or something! He needs to go to jail! Dustlawyer Nov 2012 #78
Those fuckers. They will stop at nothing. K&R KaryninMiami Nov 2012 #4
Wow, were you given water or food on line? flamingdem Nov 2012 #6
Husted and Scott. LisaL Nov 2012 #16
Rick Scott is an asshole SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2012 #19
I really think we have it already in early votes rbrnmw Nov 2012 #7
I want you to be right however it's not 2004 in many ways flamingdem Nov 2012 #17
I don't think we should just watch Husted trying to throw out tens of thousands potential votes. LisaL Nov 2012 #18
We don't need no law dogs in Ohio. tavernier Nov 2012 #8
This is why the tout state rights when they don't hold the Whitehouse. So they can corrupt the vote. The Wielding Truth Nov 2012 #9
Kick and rec...n/t littlemissmartypants Nov 2012 #10
And again. Supersedeas Nov 2012 #76
Muthafuckas progressoid Nov 2012 #11
Is there any chance of getting an injunction on Monday? BlueStreak Nov 2012 #12
My guess is that O's team is looking into that...if they think a judge will grant it... CTyankee Nov 2012 #15
I am not a lawyer, but I believe judges are supposed to issue TROs when ... BlueStreak Nov 2012 #24
I would think a judge would be pretty outraged by this tactic as well... CTyankee Nov 2012 #29
And the whole point of a PROVISIONAL ballot in the first place BlueStreak Nov 2012 #35
Yes! CTyankee Nov 2012 #37
Is this directive saying that if the person says includes their last 4 digits or their SS# Maraya1969 Nov 2012 #39
No. Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #62
Would be nice to see that.. socialindependocrat Nov 2012 #69
Well... Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #74
Nothing in the directive suggests destroying ballots. Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #59
The directive relieves poll workers of their responsibility to try to get correct info BlueStreak Nov 2012 #71
The directive does not change anything the pollworkers are doing. Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #73
The BoE workers have a moral responsibility if not a legal one BlueStreak Nov 2012 #77
Sorry if I seem frustrated - Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #79
OK. Thank you for that explanation BlueStreak Nov 2012 #80
They can start sorting them on Wednesday into different catogories Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #81
They need to get that injunction after the vote but before certification...so corrupt. bkkyosemite Nov 2012 #47
So a PASSPORT isn't good enough ID?!???!!? kath Nov 2012 #13
According to the SoS website, it is. a la izquierda Nov 2012 #22
You don't need an Ohio ID SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2012 #23
A lot of ballots could be provisional this year. LisaL Nov 2012 #25
Yes, I understand that SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2012 #30
You can also take your absentee ballot to the BOE before voting ends Maeve Nov 2012 #31
Is it? From what I could tell poking around the various OH websites, a passport is not kath Nov 2012 #27
You are correct--it's about the address Maeve Nov 2012 #33
I started to answer - Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #43
!!!!! Maeve Nov 2012 #44
Yeah, I suppose you we're right... a la izquierda Nov 2012 #36
Passport doesn't have an address on it gravity Nov 2012 #32
Theoretically, the issue isn't residence Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #45
Throw his ass in prison Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #14
If he is trying to subvert the vote... liberalmuse Nov 2012 #20
Asshole, yes SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2012 #21
It is called "voting suppression" and it has been trademarked and patented by the Republicans Coyotl Nov 2012 #28
I remember grade school civics/history class we discussed the Voter's Rights Act. Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2012 #34
An act or law is only as good as its enforcement! ananda Nov 2012 #38
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Nov 2012 #40
However the courts sulphurdunn Nov 2012 #41
This ruling will be smacked down before 10:00 AM Monday Botany Nov 2012 #42
How many early votes were already cast before directive came out, probably nullifying them? julian09 Nov 2012 #46
First - the directive doesn't affect all early votes - Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #50
Thank you for this in-depth explanation! SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2012 #56
Friday is really short - Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #63
Simple Mistake Could Cost Your Vote. cynzke Nov 2012 #49
No. Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #64
Why Can't DOJ JAIL THIS FUCKER? triplepoint Nov 2012 #51
Let us repeat: WHY IS HUSTED NOT IN JAIL? garthranzz Nov 2012 #52
Provisional Ballots Go Right Into the Trash--They Are "Placebo Ballots" triplepoint Nov 2012 #53
While it is clearly better to avoid a provisional ballot, Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #65
Sounds Good.....but triplepoint Nov 2012 #67
I am an observer in a R county in Ohio, Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #68
Again, many thanks for helping clear up misunderstandings of how Ohio works Maeve Nov 2012 #70
You're welcome Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #75
. blkmusclmachine Nov 2012 #54
Totally Shameless Larry66 Nov 2012 #55
So, the law says county election official employees are supposed to fill out the form, right? patrice Nov 2012 #57
They are obligated to verify the ID Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #66
So much stuff on Husted that it is clear he is completely corrupted by power. nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2012 #58
Husted is already breaking Ohio law. Panasonic Nov 2012 #60
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #72
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Last-Minute Ohio Directiv...»Reply #73