General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Just a Garland reminder [View all]TigressDem
(5,125 posts)The warrant was made public with minimal redaction.
The list of items found was made public with minimal redaction.
The process has been transparent and that means that we see a lot of evidence already.
People have linked legal reviews of the case showing the strength on what is in the public view.
Did you doubt that Derrik Chauvin killed George Floyd?
Did you even watch that video?
NO it isn't my "job" to determine guilt unless I am selected for a jury, but I can state with confidence that the case so far seems solid and there is likely more evidence that can't be shared due to the confidential nature of the documents.
AND the basic thing is, NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.
So if police came to your house with a valid search warrant and found out after you lost your job, you walked out with proprietary company documents that were kept in a safe at the office with specific rules to not remove them but you broke those rules because WHEN you were still employed you had rights to those documents, you would be facing criminal charges of theft.
You would still get a trial and have a chance to explain yourself. But it would be a solid case.