Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: For many people Obama is not a "lesser evil." For the privileged, he can be. [View all]Kaleva
(40,345 posts)134. Still, that has to be tough for two people to live on
I'm fortunate in that my home is paid for so there's no mortgage payment. I don't recall seeing you at the Frugal and Energy Efficient Living group here at DU but you may be interested in checking it out.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1128
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
141 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
For many people Obama is not a "lesser evil." For the privileged, he can be. [View all]
joshcryer
Nov 2012
OP
Yeah, but you don't throw out ACA and say that's "not a reason" to vote for him, do you?
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#9
I hate the individual mandate and I'm not willing to throw out the whole ACA to get rid of it
Zalatix
Nov 2012
#54
one thing maybe you should know, is that wealth does not necessarily = intelligence
quinnox
Nov 2012
#22
You are projecting. I never once said wealth = intelligence or poor = stupid.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#23
That's the way Obama supporters feel - we're being told we're stupid, not progressive. Ain't true
freshwest
Nov 2012
#94
McCain got 59% of the white male vote; not that much different than 53% of the white female vote eom
amborin
Nov 2012
#66
I even pointed out in OP how Cuba's preventative health was adopted by the US.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#48
No, I think that you misread the intent of the OP due to your own preconceptions.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#49
No where did I say that they cannot "understand the lesser of two evils" viewpoint.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#36
Enjoy your spoon fed corporate talking points and oil industry propaganda.
limpyhobbler
Nov 2012
#125
Never did I imply that the poor were stupid. You are just jumping on the bash OP bandwagon.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#45
Sure you did, the poor lack sophistication, the poor are governed by the harsh realities.
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#51
I didn't say they lacked sophistication. The social safety net does not rely on ones sophistication.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#55
So you don't get the adulation you have become accustomed to elsewhere when you come to DU?
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#63
You wrote about a group of which you are not a part in a manner some members felt condescending
Fumesucker
Nov 2012
#71
I only tried to give people the perspective of those who do not think Obama is a lesser evil.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#79
You have to be privileged to think the Democrats are anything else than the lesser of two evils.
redgreenandblue
Nov 2012
#90
The political system is set up such that there will be two parties, and two parties only.
redgreenandblue
Nov 2012
#97
Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment, WIC, food stamps and health care are not crumbs.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#109
Right so, one candidate who will slash those programs, and one who might cut them a little,
limpyhobbler
Nov 2012
#119
Being the lesser of "two evils" and not having a reason to vote for Obama are not opposites.
Ms. Toad
Nov 2012
#96
No secret I have been critical of Obama. Six months ago I was going to vote for a 3rd party.
Autumn
Nov 2012
#99
It's got to be incrediably tough for you & your husband to live on $15,160 a year!
Kaleva
Nov 2012
#121
There seems to be a diffence between democrat and liberal or progressive these days
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2012
#129
I disagree that it's a change/schism in Democrats across the nation, though.
woo me with science
Nov 2012
#136
Technically with the ouster of the blue dogs the Democratic party is more leftward than before.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#139
The Democrats and Republicans have always been a party of powerful interests.
joshcryer
Nov 2012
#140