Rat feeding study suggests the Impossible Burger may not be safe to eat

[Hortensis]

114. "Overall, we rate GMWatch as a moderate conspiracy website and quackery-level pseudoscience

source based on the consistent promotion of anti-GMO propaganda that does not align with the consensus of science.

Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEFT CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: United Kingdom
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Organization/Foundation
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History
Founded in 1998 by Jonathan Matthews, who is affiliated with Maharishi International University, a part of the transcendental meditation (TM) movement that some have called a cult. According to their about page, “GMWatch provides the public with ..." Put another way, GMWatch is a news and information hub for Anti-GMO propagandists. ...

Analysis / Bias
In review, “GMWatch’s stated goal is to eliminate all genetically modified crops and foods and slow down the progress of biotechnology and advanced genetic research.” It does this through the publication of news regarding GMOs and Biotech that is consistently negative ...

The website also promotes the debunked 2012 study ... The study used cancer-prone rats, shoddy controls, and the data cherry-picked (e.g. data showed some rats fed glyphosate had few tumors, which the authors did not highlight in their commentary).”

Although numerous positive studies support the benefits and minimal risks of GMOs, GMWatch never publishes them, leading to a highly misleading and biased website.

Failed Fact Checks
The EU Commission is beginning the process of removing safety checks on genetically modified crops. – Fake ...

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/gmwatch/

There are other evaluations with similar results. One college cites a GMWatch lie in a lesson about fack checking.

Can someone find and post a REPUTABLE report on this claim? All I found is the kind of stuff that turns vulnerable social media soakers into Qnuts.