General Discussion

Sympthsical

(10,815 posts)

36. You didn't read that for context at all, did you?

Sun Sep 25, 2022, 06:37 PM

Sep 2022

Here, allow me:

"There is little indication that an 18-year-old who died after being struck by an SUV in North Dakota was a political extremist like the driver claimed."

The man who killed the teen has claimed the teen was an extremist. The article notes the kid wasn't.

This is about the murderer's intent and belief. Did he believe he was harming an "extremist". According to 911 dispatches, that is what he himself claimed. The murderer claimed that. With his own words. On tape.

This article doesn't say anything like what you think it says, and it's kind of . . . gross to try to bend a kid's murder around a hoped for useful narrative. Not a good look.

I thought the "yoohoo" part before presenting an egregious misread was cute, though. Great confidence in error seems pretty characteristic of our social media culture these days.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Man admits to killing teen after political dispute in Foster Co., court docs allege [View all] The Grand Illuminist Sep 2022 OP

Sounds like the perp is mental and/or alcoholic. Ocelot II Sep 2022 #1

I've been observing the curious radio silence on this one Sympthsical Sep 2022 #2

I think the reason for the low key is..... The Grand Illuminist Sep 2022 #4

Many will find your analysis uncomfortable, sarisataka Sep 2022 #5

+1000, great points WarGamer Sep 2022 #13

Since you seem to be doing a lot of false equivalencies and hypotheticals... W_HAMILTON Sep 2022 #15

If someone puts a blindfold on Sympthsical Sep 2022 #17

In this case, you are the one with the blindfold on. W_HAMILTON Sep 2022 #28

I hate to say it, but I suspect you are correct Amishman Sep 2022 #18

Surely you're not surprised? nt BlackSkimmer Sep 2022 #19

I'm not mad Sympthsical Sep 2022 #20

First I've heard about it Bettie Sep 2022 #22

Why didn't you hear about it? Sympthsical Sep 2022 #23

So, what response would you have liked to this story? Bettie Sep 2022 #25

Good answer. Kingofalldems Sep 2022 #31

You don't know if it would have gone viral if it were swapped around Kaleva Sep 2022 #29

+1 DashOneBravo Sep 2022 #30

Yoohoo -- something for you to think about: W_HAMILTON Sep 2022 #35

You didn't read that for context at all, did you? Sympthsical Sep 2022 #36

The drunk killer claimed a defense that has not been borne out by any of the evidence. W_HAMILTON Sep 2022 #37

You have two (terrible) options here Sympthsical Sep 2022 #38

He was a drunken murderer. W_HAMILTON Sep 2022 #39

One thing for sure, he's certainly not 2 Polybius Sep 2022 #3

In what possible way, shape or form sarisataka Sep 2022 #6

Sounds like an open and shut case of MURDER. The guy didn't like the other's viewpoint, SWBTATTReg Sep 2022 #7

This was a right-wing wet dream during the George Floyd protests. Iggo Sep 2022 #9

Warning!!! Don't act like a Republican. It will end badly. comradebillyboy Sep 2022 #8

You support what happened? former9thward Sep 2022 #10

Of course not. The perp acted like a Republican by running over that kid. comradebillyboy Sep 2022 #12

Exactly--they make their killers into heroes. Kingofalldems Sep 2022 #32

Those hypotheses are bad blogslug Sep 2022 #11

Or....4. The guy's a drunken asshole. n/t Captain Stern Sep 2022 #14

+1 MrsCoffee Sep 2022 #21

Where in your story does it claim the man was a progressive? W_HAMILTON Sep 2022 #16

EXACTLY A lot of jumping to conclusions in this thread. He could have had an argument Liberal In Texas Sep 2022 #24

We don't know if there even was a political arguement Kaleva Sep 2022 #27

I think it was seen as an opportunity to attack DU Kingofalldems Sep 2022 #33

Note to self: no matter how much you hate them, don't run them over. Vinca Sep 2022 #26

Little evidence of political argument before teen's death Eugene Sep 2022 #34