Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Solomon

(12,644 posts)

1. Bwaaa haaaaa!

Reply to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)

Thu Sep 29, 2022, 12:14 AM

Sep 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

51 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If you missed it, FG response to Dearie [View all] Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 OP

Bwaaa haaaaa! Solomon Sep 2022 #1

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 lisa58 Sep 2022 #2

Is this the $3mil lawyer? rubbersole Sep 2022 #3

If he was hired to obfuscate, actually worth it to a traitor:) Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #4

HAHA Dorian Gray Sep 2022 #22

No inthewind21 Sep 2022 #34

Just to be clear, 200,000 pages is a pallet of paper: Gaugamela Sep 2022 #5

Yikes. Have to say, if it wasn't so freaking obvious Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #7

Holy cow, I had no idea! ShazzieB Sep 2022 #18

images from tweet ... Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2022 #6

Thank you!!! Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #8

Welcome. :) Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2022 #11

I got one thing from this bag of sh-t response. usonian Sep 2022 #9

Lawrence O'Donnell loves to point out the name of that case! ShazzieB Sep 2022 #20

I don't Delphinus Sep 2022 #23

Oh, don't worry. Ligyron Sep 2022 #26

Because inthewind21 Sep 2022 #35

tangerine twatt waffle spanone Sep 2022 #46

I thought Dearie set up the original timeline? EndlessWire Sep 2022 #10

Link to new NYT article was good refresher of the case for me Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #15

Dearie doesn't have the authority to declare anyone in contempt or issue a bench warrant onenote Sep 2022 #37

Yes, I see that. EndlessWire Sep 2022 #43

The Government never said it would pay the vendor. onenote Sep 2022 #44

Anticipating Judge Dearie's Cha Sep 2022 #12

I'm thinking the Judge's smackdown is going to be friggin' epic Hugh_Lebowski Sep 2022 #13

Yes, We've seen his work! Cha Sep 2022 #16

It ought to be interesting, that's for sure! ShazzieB Sep 2022 #21

Yes! Good article on it all from NYT Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #14

Ouch and Dead On! Cha Sep 2022 #17

Judge Dearie won't be making a response onenote Sep 2022 #38

Ohh.. I'm really sorry to Cha Sep 2022 #42

That is one helluva an admission: 200,000 pages Hekate Sep 2022 #19

I know! Delphinus Sep 2022 #24

Insane! Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #25

Best I understand, these are non-classfied. FG argued that Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #27

I believe I heard the same, PRETZEL Sep 2022 #28

Most of those documents weren't his Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #29

Curious what an example might be of a non-classified Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #32

Any official government document he took belongs to the national archives Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #33

Thank you for that explanation. So say a prez wants Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #39

This may answer a lot of your questions onenote Sep 2022 #45

Thanks. Anxious to read. Although have heard the whole Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #47

So why are they even looking for privilege issues? Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #48

Becasue inthewind21 Sep 2022 #36

Thank u! So if trump team certifies that inventory taken Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #40

I think you've got it Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #49

If he had some of the things I think he had, 100 pages is extremely low jmowreader Oct 2022 #51

We had a guy at Fort Campbell who was kinda like that jmowreader Sep 2022 #30

That's interesting. Was the punishment the same for both amounts? Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #41

Yes. Same punishment. jmowreader Oct 2022 #50

Is it time to indict the FG's attorneys yet? nt Samrob Sep 2022 #31