Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you missed it, FG response to Dearie [View all]EndlessWire
(8,103 posts)10. I thought Dearie set up the original timeline?
And, there is a difference between 11,000 documents and 200,000 pages of those documents.
I believe what the Gov said, that none of the vendors would work with Trump. It makes no sense to have the Gov pay up front on Trump's behalf, although I am sure that Trump loves the concept. I didn't see where he offered to pay his legal bill for the vendor, which Dearie told Trump he would have to pay.
This may sink the whole concept of SM, but I don't see how you backtrack. I think Trump's got money and just doesn't want to fork over. But, this is more in line with obstructing the case flow.
I wonder what Trump would do if Dearie declared him in contempt of Court and had a bench warrant issued for his arrest.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations