Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(53,226 posts)
30. We had a guy at Fort Campbell who was kinda like that
Thu Sep 29, 2022, 11:50 AM
Sep 2022

We used to have these barracks searches called Health and Welfare Inspections in the 101st Airborne. This one turned into the most epic Article 15 ever handed down in the history of the division.

I was in the 311th Military Intelligence Battalion which had four companies: Headquarters, Headquarters and Operations Company which had the signals intelligence analysis center, the Operations Security Platoon (I was in this one), the Image Interpretation Platoon, a couple other platoons I don't remember, and the battalion headquarters. Alpha Company was the signals intercept company. Bravo Company was the Ground Surveillance Radar company, which was basically infantry with radars. Charlie Company was our service company and held the motor pool, the electronics maintenance platoon and the mess hall. This guy was a GSR operator in Bravo Company.

This guy had some marijuana in his room. The Army was less strict with marijuana than it is now, so he was looking at loss of a week's pay and restriction to post for two weeks. Not a huge punishment. His squad leader did the search, the squad leader found the weed, the squad leader turned in weed and referred him to the CO for disciplinary action.

Comes the day of the Article 15 hearing. His squad leader, platoon sergeant, platoon leader and the first sergeant were all in the CO's office when this guy reports for his hearing. The CO picks up the form and begins to read.

"Private so-and-so, I am considering punishing you under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for the offense of possessing two marijuana cigarettes in violation of Article 112a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice."

Oh shit.

This guy just went the fuck off. "Sir, I had a whole lid of weed. That motherfucker stole my dope!"

I don't know how many years that motherfucker got, but false official statements and tampering with evidence are far more serious offenses in the military than possessing either two joints or a whole lid of weed was.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If you missed it, FG response to Dearie [View all] Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 OP
Bwaaa haaaaa! Solomon Sep 2022 #1
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 lisa58 Sep 2022 #2
Is this the $3mil lawyer? rubbersole Sep 2022 #3
If he was hired to obfuscate, actually worth it to a traitor:) Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #4
HAHA Dorian Gray Sep 2022 #22
No inthewind21 Sep 2022 #34
Just to be clear, 200,000 pages is a pallet of paper: Gaugamela Sep 2022 #5
Yikes. Have to say, if it wasn't so freaking obvious Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #7
Holy cow, I had no idea! ShazzieB Sep 2022 #18
images from tweet ... Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2022 #6
Thank you!!! Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #8
Welcome. :) Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2022 #11
I got one thing from this bag of sh-t response. usonian Sep 2022 #9
Lawrence O'Donnell loves to point out the name of that case! ShazzieB Sep 2022 #20
I don't Delphinus Sep 2022 #23
Oh, don't worry. Ligyron Sep 2022 #26
Because inthewind21 Sep 2022 #35
tangerine twatt waffle spanone Sep 2022 #46
I thought Dearie set up the original timeline? EndlessWire Sep 2022 #10
Link to new NYT article was good refresher of the case for me Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #15
Dearie doesn't have the authority to declare anyone in contempt or issue a bench warrant onenote Sep 2022 #37
Yes, I see that. EndlessWire Sep 2022 #43
The Government never said it would pay the vendor. onenote Sep 2022 #44
Anticipating Judge Dearie's Cha Sep 2022 #12
I'm thinking the Judge's smackdown is going to be friggin' epic Hugh_Lebowski Sep 2022 #13
Yes, We've seen his work! Cha Sep 2022 #16
It ought to be interesting, that's for sure! ShazzieB Sep 2022 #21
Yes! Good article on it all from NYT Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #14
Ouch and Dead On! Cha Sep 2022 #17
Judge Dearie won't be making a response onenote Sep 2022 #38
Ohh.. I'm really sorry to Cha Sep 2022 #42
That is one helluva an admission: 200,000 pages Hekate Sep 2022 #19
I know! Delphinus Sep 2022 #24
Insane! Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #25
Best I understand, these are non-classfied. FG argued that Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #27
I believe I heard the same, PRETZEL Sep 2022 #28
Most of those documents weren't his Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #29
Curious what an example might be of a non-classified Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #32
Any official government document he took belongs to the national archives Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #33
Thank you for that explanation. So say a prez wants Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #39
This may answer a lot of your questions onenote Sep 2022 #45
Thanks. Anxious to read. Although have heard the whole Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #47
So why are they even looking for privilege issues? Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #48
Becasue inthewind21 Sep 2022 #36
Thank u! So if trump team certifies that inventory taken Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #40
I think you've got it Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #49
If he had some of the things I think he had, 100 pages is extremely low jmowreader Oct 2022 #51
We had a guy at Fort Campbell who was kinda like that jmowreader Sep 2022 #30
That's interesting. Was the punishment the same for both amounts? Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #41
Yes. Same punishment. jmowreader Oct 2022 #50
Is it time to indict the FG's attorneys yet? nt Samrob Sep 2022 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you missed it, FG resp...»Reply #30