Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Johnny2X2X

(24,299 posts)
49. I think you've got it
Fri Sep 30, 2022, 08:39 AM
Sep 2022

They are refusing to agree to the documents that were there because that is an admission of guilt. Akin to saying to the police that the cocaine they found in your car is in fact yours.

It's smart of Trump's lawyers not to certify what was seized in the raid. But I don't think it will help their case much in the end.

There's kind of a catch-22 involved in investigating an ex President. In any normal case, there already would have been charges and arrests, but because this is Trump, the justice department wants to go to the nth degree to do everything by the book and have an ironclad case. So a defense will be that the DOJ went to unusual lengths in this case.

I think he will be indicted, that is certain now, but I think it could take a while and how it all turns out is anyone's guess because this is truly uncharted territory.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If you missed it, FG response to Dearie [View all] Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 OP
Bwaaa haaaaa! Solomon Sep 2022 #1
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 lisa58 Sep 2022 #2
Is this the $3mil lawyer? rubbersole Sep 2022 #3
If he was hired to obfuscate, actually worth it to a traitor:) Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #4
HAHA Dorian Gray Sep 2022 #22
No inthewind21 Sep 2022 #34
Just to be clear, 200,000 pages is a pallet of paper: Gaugamela Sep 2022 #5
Yikes. Have to say, if it wasn't so freaking obvious Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #7
Holy cow, I had no idea! ShazzieB Sep 2022 #18
images from tweet ... Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2022 #6
Thank you!!! Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #8
Welcome. :) Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2022 #11
I got one thing from this bag of sh-t response. usonian Sep 2022 #9
Lawrence O'Donnell loves to point out the name of that case! ShazzieB Sep 2022 #20
I don't Delphinus Sep 2022 #23
Oh, don't worry. Ligyron Sep 2022 #26
Because inthewind21 Sep 2022 #35
tangerine twatt waffle spanone Sep 2022 #46
I thought Dearie set up the original timeline? EndlessWire Sep 2022 #10
Link to new NYT article was good refresher of the case for me Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #15
Dearie doesn't have the authority to declare anyone in contempt or issue a bench warrant onenote Sep 2022 #37
Yes, I see that. EndlessWire Sep 2022 #43
The Government never said it would pay the vendor. onenote Sep 2022 #44
Anticipating Judge Dearie's Cha Sep 2022 #12
I'm thinking the Judge's smackdown is going to be friggin' epic Hugh_Lebowski Sep 2022 #13
Yes, We've seen his work! Cha Sep 2022 #16
It ought to be interesting, that's for sure! ShazzieB Sep 2022 #21
Yes! Good article on it all from NYT Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #14
Ouch and Dead On! Cha Sep 2022 #17
Judge Dearie won't be making a response onenote Sep 2022 #38
Ohh.. I'm really sorry to Cha Sep 2022 #42
That is one helluva an admission: 200,000 pages Hekate Sep 2022 #19
I know! Delphinus Sep 2022 #24
Insane! Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #25
Best I understand, these are non-classfied. FG argued that Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #27
I believe I heard the same, PRETZEL Sep 2022 #28
Most of those documents weren't his Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #29
Curious what an example might be of a non-classified Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #32
Any official government document he took belongs to the national archives Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #33
Thank you for that explanation. So say a prez wants Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #39
This may answer a lot of your questions onenote Sep 2022 #45
Thanks. Anxious to read. Although have heard the whole Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #47
So why are they even looking for privilege issues? Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #48
Becasue inthewind21 Sep 2022 #36
Thank u! So if trump team certifies that inventory taken Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #40
I think you've got it Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #49
If he had some of the things I think he had, 100 pages is extremely low jmowreader Oct 2022 #51
We had a guy at Fort Campbell who was kinda like that jmowreader Sep 2022 #30
That's interesting. Was the punishment the same for both amounts? Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2022 #41
Yes. Same punishment. jmowreader Oct 2022 #50
Is it time to indict the FG's attorneys yet? nt Samrob Sep 2022 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you missed it, FG resp...»Reply #49