Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Our DOJ IS MIA [View all]former9thward
(33,424 posts)116. I think you know how it works.
People here have complained about people trying to overthrow the government not being held accountable. Are misdemeanors which affect nothing in life an example of being held accountable? As I have posted in the past I don't happen to think this was a serious attempt to overthrow anything. It was a riot led by loudmouths. So I personally have no problem with how the DOJ has handled this. But not viewing Jan 6 as an "overthrow" is a minority view which is not held by some of those defending DOJ actions. I find that odd.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
134 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I wouldn't say it is homophobic, but obviously Garland has fortitude. OP obviously has ZERO clue
emulatorloo
Oct 2022
#95
Some situations call for extreme courage, others call for radical acceptance
Fiendish Thingy
Oct 2022
#101
I don't remember any words like extreme or radical in the Serennity Prayer.
msfiddlestix
Oct 2022
#102
not this shit again. It was Trump's administration who oversaw those documents he stole
bigtree
Oct 2022
#6
FFS you are quoting Murdoch's Wall Street Journal to justify your baseless screed?
emulatorloo
Oct 2022
#96
They don't count because "Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied" or some nonsense
AZSkiffyGeek
Oct 2022
#92
Nope, not gonna bite. I wouldn't want to rescind that just to satisfy my frustration.
Tadpole Raisin
Oct 2022
#49
Care to shed a little light on what you're doing to help the DOJ? Maybe we can help?
msfiddlestix
Oct 2022
#99
If the DOJ believes in the rule of law they are not showing America that belief.
SayItLoud
Oct 2022
#26
He certainly didn't go with the "we're doomed" philosophy I sometimes see here.
brooklynite
Oct 2022
#88
Schiff is as uninformed about the details of DOJ's investigation as the rest of the American public
bigtree
Oct 2022
#34
Many of the questions you have about Garland have been answered, you don't listen.
fightforfreedom
Oct 2022
#35
They don't want to listen or learn. They just want to whine for attention.
we can do it
Oct 2022
#106
This tread is a reminder that we have 2, possibly 3 different justice systems in the US
yaesu
Oct 2022
#32
The fact you have to ask this question at this point is part of the frustration
uponit7771
Oct 2022
#124
I believe Oversight asked NARA to confirm if all the records had been returned.
Fiendish Thingy
Oct 2022
#45
There is nothing in the Constitution nor in general principles of justice and fair law enforcement...
Silent3
Oct 2022
#75
Instead of knee-jerk reacting in order to be contrarian and get attention
BumRushDaShow
Oct 2022
#126