Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

More saber rattling. A radioactive tsunami....it would poison a good portion of Russia..especially PortTack Oct 2022 #1
Good point. ColinC Oct 2022 #2
No. former9thward Oct 2022 #19
A tactical nuke..really no such thing PortTack Oct 2022 #27
That is a political statement by a political appointee. former9thward Oct 2022 #29
It's from SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN.. it is not just a political statement!! PortTack Oct 2022 #31
Why does the DOD use the term "tactical nuclear weapons" ? former9thward Oct 2022 #32
Read my update...or do a search yourself. Tactical nukes is very misleading PortTack Oct 2022 #33
Another garbage right wing outlet... Spazito Oct 2022 #3
Yes, only right-wing sites are reporting this. GoCubsGo Oct 2022 #6
Exactly! Spazito Oct 2022 #9
I've got a radioactive tsunami in my pants for Murdoch-owned media belpejic Oct 2022 #37
And that US/NATO Hunter/Killer sub that's shadowing it that NATO isn't talking about MarineCombatEngineer Oct 2022 #4
I saw an interesting interview with the captain of our stealth nuclear sub..very interesting PortTack Oct 2022 #28
+100 nt MarineCombatEngineer Oct 2022 #30
Let's see how this turns out. OAITW r.2.0 Oct 2022 #5
Gee, a brand-new Russian submarine in the Arctic? grumpyduck Oct 2022 #7
I can't say how but "we are on it." Botany Oct 2022 #8
GQP: go ahead. Root for the Russians, now. lindysalsagal Oct 2022 #10
"capable of creating a 1,600-ft 'radioactive tsunami" ruet Oct 2022 #11
No worries. The US Navy knows where the subs exhaust port is maxrandb Oct 2022 #12
Indeed...I don't think Operation Crossroads or Operation Wigwam had 1,600ft waves EX500rider Oct 2022 #13
... ruet Oct 2022 #18
Nope. Not buying one word of it. Stinky The Clown Oct 2022 #14
Oh noos. Disaffected Oct 2022 #15
Fails The Smell Test ProfessorGAC Oct 2022 #16
A more likely explanation sarisataka Oct 2022 #17
Oh, FUD! FSogol Oct 2022 #20
Headline: "armed with doomsday weapon" Mr.Bill Oct 2022 #21
A radioactive tsunami VGNonly Oct 2022 #22
You've lost another submarine? ThoughtCriminal Oct 2022 #23
Vladdy should ask how all those super V-weapons worked out for the Nazis. localroger Oct 2022 #24
The way the Russian's build things it probably sank... Buckeyeblue Oct 2022 #25
Just in terms of execution, it fails basic physics tests. KY_EnviroGuy Oct 2022 #26
the plot... myohmy2 Oct 2022 #34
This is a little too Dr. Evil to be believable Renew Deal Oct 2022 #35
"When I gazed into Putin's soul, the abyss gazed back into me" struggle4progress Oct 2022 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Russian nuclear submarine...»Reply #10