Nuclear Weapons Convoy Spotted in Russia

[SunSeeker]

38. Well Russia DOESN'T support the rules of the UN. Yet you want it on the UN SC with veto power.

There is nothing "logical" about your position.

It is not "logical" for a country that commits genocide to have veto power on the UN SC. I don't know what you mean by a "new UN," but we do need reforms to the UN SC so that the UN can stop genocidal dictators and can enforce its own charter.

And you are dead wrong about Biden's and the US position. The US and Biden absolutely do support major reforms to the UN SC. In his recent speech to the UN, Biden called for far reaching changes to the UN SC, including an increase in both permanent and nonpermanent members of UN SC to dilute Russia’s power. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/21/biden-un-blasts-russia-ukraine/

And yes you absolutely are trashing DUers and DU, by falsely claiming there are "countless" DU posts on the position, and suggesting it is "illogical" for DUers to expect Russia to comply with the 1963 Test Ban Treaty while Russia is still sitting on the UN SC as the USSR. All so you can claim DUers are "illogical."

Like I said in my above post, there is nothing contradictory or "illogical" about wanting Russia, as long as it is still on the UN SC, even though it should not be, to at least comply with the 1963 Test Ban Treaty as the USSR. It is you who is twisting logic in a knot, and misrepresenting now Biden’s position, to trash DU and DUers.