General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Inevitable Indictment of Donald Trump [View all]electric_blue68
(27,386 posts)It continues to make me think Garland just might indict drumphf if the case is tight enough, and because of some of tfg's latest statements.
Because Garland was so involved in the Oklahoma City Bombing horror where deep reactions to Mcveigh's case would emerge once a decision was reached - he's been through those rather fraught circumstance.
The fact that deep racism propelled McVeigh & Nichols to their actions; that improvements to the USA's Black citizens in many cases kept improving over time kept angering these racists.
Add in the fact that then later on underlying everything white voters said about why they voted for Trump most, if not all had an undercurrent of racism. And thus one of the main reasons MAGAT's wanted to keep him (since he brought racism out from under the rocks, and made it "acceptable", though other vunerable populations were also targets for demogogery) in the White House.
Justice as many people see it is to right wrongs including unwarranted restrictions, add ways to limit horrific actions; thus AG Garland has as part his actions in a grimly poetic way of "history doesn't repeat itself, but sometimes it rhymes" has the opportunity to help stymie some of the actions of the the man who opened Pandora's Box of racism yet again by at least indicting former President Trump.