Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Traildogbob

(13,016 posts)
39. UnfortunatelyI think you are right
Sat Oct 15, 2022, 11:35 AM
Oct 2022

And it’s a sad state, and unsustainable one, when law makers are above the law. Especially the laws about traitors and treason. Unless you are a Dem that pretends to grab a sleeping ladies boobs. That’s some serious criming there. No weak stuff like stealing Too Secret Docs To auction off, or Pimp for minors girls. USA USA USA!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's dawning on people that the J6 committee is only going after Trump? Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #1
Liz Cheney's influence? sop Oct 2022 #2
My theory is that a deal was cut before the committee was formed. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #5
Getz and Jordan mobeau69 Oct 2022 #7
Exactly, then McCarthy pulls all GOP members off the committee. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #9
If two sitting US senators are indicted for their role in 1/6, I will revise my theory. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #15
Would them quietly "retiring" also fill the bill? Hugin Oct 2022 #23
No, quiet resignations in DC means deals were cut. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #28
Interesting thought. Traildogbob Oct 2022 #25
That Colbert short cartoon about the flynnstones was so funny kimbutgar Oct 2022 #27
MTG is Barney Rubble. Traildogbob Oct 2022 #29
Thanks for the video. Traildogbob Oct 2022 #30
That put a chuckle in my morning coffee wake up time! msfiddlestix Oct 2022 #52
Yep. People have no idea how power works inside the beltway. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #31
I hope Meadows and McCarthy is part of that circle. Traildogbob Oct 2022 #33
I think the sitting members of congress are safe. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #35
I do not think any member of Congress, gab13by13 Oct 2022 #37
I agree. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #42
UnfortunatelyI think you are right Traildogbob Oct 2022 #39
Also Trump sealed his fate when he attacked the US congress. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #40
Yeah, pulling back that particular rug would have crippled the club for years. Hugin Oct 2022 #11
Exactly. No one wanted half the US Congress indicted for treason. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #12
What good is that deal gab13by13 Oct 2022 #46
Yup. Darth's spawn. SheltieLover Oct 2022 #16
We will probably never find out. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #17
Of course we won't. SheltieLover Oct 2022 #22
✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ n/t msfiddlestix Oct 2022 #47
More like your "conspiracy theory." Zero facts. You apparently don't evenknow who the chairman is. emulatorloo Oct 2022 #56
The facts will tell the story. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #60
Of course. emulatorloo Oct 2022 #61
Theories change as more data comes in. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #65
Liz Cheney has the support at the highest levels of congressional power. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #63
"Trump is hurting the GOP brand" markodochartaigh Oct 2022 #57
Trump's fate was sealed when he attacked the US congress and threaten to kill them. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #62
Follow the Money homegirl Oct 2022 #44
Yes this was a well funded huge operation. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #59
There's only so much they can fit into the public hearings, Ocelot II Oct 2022 #3
That's a really good point and also answers my question why... Pacifist Patriot Oct 2022 #4
Of course. The committee investigated the activities at the Willard, Hortensis Oct 2022 #64
This has made me nuts! Quakerfriend Oct 2022 #6
Is it possible the DOJ has told them hands off the Willard? BlueIdaho Oct 2022 #8
That sounds possible. I was thinking along the same lines. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #24
This. Exactly. DOJ is prosecuting the Willard Crew Captain Zero Oct 2022 #38
DOJ is prosecuting the Willard Crew? Good to know, it's been challenging to keep up. ty msfiddlestix Oct 2022 #50
Yeah seems plausible. My kooky theory is DOJ said hands off Mark Meadows too, because he's emulatorloo Oct 2022 #58
How do you or anybody else know they didn't? AG Garland, (My maiden name, I'm proud to say), The_REAL_Ecumenist Oct 2022 #10
So true Rebl2 Oct 2022 #21
Not gonna second guess their excellent work. NT Patton French Oct 2022 #13
We are talking about the most expansive legal investigation NoMoreRepugs Oct 2022 #14
They aren't going after the pukes in charge who were in on it. Jan6 Part 2 should be interesting. Autumn Oct 2022 #18
as a former housekeeper/maintenance in hotels/resorts ShepKat Oct 2022 #19
Good point, they may have. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #32
Remember there are courts thing and committee things. Historic NY Oct 2022 #20
Why wouldn't they share it with the public? brooklynite Oct 2022 #26
I don't know. That's what I'm asking, wondering. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #34
The committee went after them gab13by13 Oct 2022 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #36
They were myopic that way. jaxexpat Oct 2022 #45
This 10,000 % msfiddlestix Oct 2022 #55
"The Executive Branch and the DOJ are so compromised..." brooklynite Oct 2022 #67
That is the question really. jaxexpat Oct 2022 #70
Did they successfully interview anyone who was at the Willard? Fiendish Thingy Oct 2022 #43
Flynn and Stone took the 5th. gab13by13 Oct 2022 #49
They just crimed so much it's hard to cover everything Heather MC Oct 2022 #48
Lol! you may be right. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #51
It is probably going to be in the report. They referred to the Willard hotel at least once on emulatorloo Oct 2022 #53
We don't know that they didn't. Their public hearings could never be long enough or Vinca Oct 2022 #54
Excellent question. Will someone leak this information? triron Oct 2022 #66
Maybe The Willard can create the Insurrection Suite . . . Mr.Mystery Oct 2022 #68
Maybe the Justice Dept advised them to not interfere in the Willard Hotel investigation? kentuck Oct 2022 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I still find it interesti...»Reply #39