Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
64. Of course. The committee investigated the activities at the Willard,
Sat Oct 15, 2022, 12:25 PM
Oct 2022

what went on there and at the others of the four or five main organizing points in DC, and identified the big points they need to get out to the people.

Investigative journals have published some very interesting reading, though, and no doubt many historians are waiting eagerly for every piece of new info that's developed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's dawning on people that the J6 committee is only going after Trump? Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #1
Liz Cheney's influence? sop Oct 2022 #2
My theory is that a deal was cut before the committee was formed. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #5
Getz and Jordan mobeau69 Oct 2022 #7
Exactly, then McCarthy pulls all GOP members off the committee. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #9
If two sitting US senators are indicted for their role in 1/6, I will revise my theory. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #15
Would them quietly "retiring" also fill the bill? Hugin Oct 2022 #23
No, quiet resignations in DC means deals were cut. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #28
Interesting thought. Traildogbob Oct 2022 #25
That Colbert short cartoon about the flynnstones was so funny kimbutgar Oct 2022 #27
MTG is Barney Rubble. Traildogbob Oct 2022 #29
Thanks for the video. Traildogbob Oct 2022 #30
That put a chuckle in my morning coffee wake up time! msfiddlestix Oct 2022 #52
Yep. People have no idea how power works inside the beltway. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #31
I hope Meadows and McCarthy is part of that circle. Traildogbob Oct 2022 #33
I think the sitting members of congress are safe. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #35
I do not think any member of Congress, gab13by13 Oct 2022 #37
I agree. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #42
UnfortunatelyI think you are right Traildogbob Oct 2022 #39
Also Trump sealed his fate when he attacked the US congress. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #40
Yeah, pulling back that particular rug would have crippled the club for years. Hugin Oct 2022 #11
Exactly. No one wanted half the US Congress indicted for treason. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #12
What good is that deal gab13by13 Oct 2022 #46
Yup. Darth's spawn. SheltieLover Oct 2022 #16
We will probably never find out. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #17
Of course we won't. SheltieLover Oct 2022 #22
✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ n/t msfiddlestix Oct 2022 #47
More like your "conspiracy theory." Zero facts. You apparently don't evenknow who the chairman is. emulatorloo Oct 2022 #56
The facts will tell the story. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #60
Of course. emulatorloo Oct 2022 #61
Theories change as more data comes in. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #65
Liz Cheney has the support at the highest levels of congressional power. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #63
"Trump is hurting the GOP brand" markodochartaigh Oct 2022 #57
Trump's fate was sealed when he attacked the US congress and threaten to kill them. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #62
Follow the Money homegirl Oct 2022 #44
Yes this was a well funded huge operation. Irish_Dem Oct 2022 #59
There's only so much they can fit into the public hearings, Ocelot II Oct 2022 #3
That's a really good point and also answers my question why... Pacifist Patriot Oct 2022 #4
Of course. The committee investigated the activities at the Willard, Hortensis Oct 2022 #64
This has made me nuts! Quakerfriend Oct 2022 #6
Is it possible the DOJ has told them hands off the Willard? BlueIdaho Oct 2022 #8
That sounds possible. I was thinking along the same lines. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #24
This. Exactly. DOJ is prosecuting the Willard Crew Captain Zero Oct 2022 #38
DOJ is prosecuting the Willard Crew? Good to know, it's been challenging to keep up. ty msfiddlestix Oct 2022 #50
Yeah seems plausible. My kooky theory is DOJ said hands off Mark Meadows too, because he's emulatorloo Oct 2022 #58
How do you or anybody else know they didn't? AG Garland, (My maiden name, I'm proud to say), The_REAL_Ecumenist Oct 2022 #10
So true Rebl2 Oct 2022 #21
Not gonna second guess their excellent work. NT Patton French Oct 2022 #13
We are talking about the most expansive legal investigation NoMoreRepugs Oct 2022 #14
They aren't going after the pukes in charge who were in on it. Jan6 Part 2 should be interesting. Autumn Oct 2022 #18
as a former housekeeper/maintenance in hotels/resorts ShepKat Oct 2022 #19
Good point, they may have. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #32
Remember there are courts thing and committee things. Historic NY Oct 2022 #20
Why wouldn't they share it with the public? brooklynite Oct 2022 #26
I don't know. That's what I'm asking, wondering. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #34
The committee went after them gab13by13 Oct 2022 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #36
They were myopic that way. jaxexpat Oct 2022 #45
This 10,000 % msfiddlestix Oct 2022 #55
"The Executive Branch and the DOJ are so compromised..." brooklynite Oct 2022 #67
That is the question really. jaxexpat Oct 2022 #70
Did they successfully interview anyone who was at the Willard? Fiendish Thingy Oct 2022 #43
Flynn and Stone took the 5th. gab13by13 Oct 2022 #49
They just crimed so much it's hard to cover everything Heather MC Oct 2022 #48
Lol! you may be right. fightforfreedom Oct 2022 #51
It is probably going to be in the report. They referred to the Willard hotel at least once on emulatorloo Oct 2022 #53
We don't know that they didn't. Their public hearings could never be long enough or Vinca Oct 2022 #54
Excellent question. Will someone leak this information? triron Oct 2022 #66
Maybe The Willard can create the Insurrection Suite . . . Mr.Mystery Oct 2022 #68
Maybe the Justice Dept advised them to not interfere in the Willard Hotel investigation? kentuck Oct 2022 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I still find it interesti...»Reply #64