Does THIS Seem at all Sexist to Anyone?

[The Doctor.]

73. Wow, you really have no clue how experiments are run, do you? This question will prove it:

Cite ONE sociological or psychological experiment where 'vital information' was not in some way withheld from the subjects/participants.

One.

In this case, you have been given information that is extraneous and not pertinent to the point of the study. In social experimentation, any such information is considered 'contamination'. You would know that if you had any kind of research background. That you cannot address the question of the OP without considering the extraneous information you have been fed only proves that. Either way, this particular study is valid only without contamination. Had someone run around the other thread claiming it was 'about him' and the 'context' included 'x,y, and z', the participants would have answered based on his information and not the question itself.

Right now, you're only imperative is to be 'right'. I've been at this a while and I know it when I see it.

If you'd like to be 'right', then give me just one example of the above where a social experiment was run with full disclosure to the participants/subjects.

But you won't. You'll evade, dodge, change the subject, whatever. I've seen it countless times and you're going to do it too. I'll at least give you three tries though.