Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When are Progressive Billionnaires going to use their wealth to buy media companies and keep them [View all]MichMan
(16,684 posts)10. Like to see them buy up a lot of rental properties and cut rents in half.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When are Progressive Billionnaires going to use their wealth to buy media companies and keep them [View all]
samsingh
Oct 2022
OP
Youtube is just an aggregator. They don't do their own research or reporting.
Ocelot II
Oct 2022
#12
it wouldn't take much to destroy the only rw medium that can create the alt reality. RW radio is
certainot
Oct 2022
#39
it's free to complain to universities and pro teams. black athletes are being used to spread racism
certainot
Oct 2022
#58
I don't know if there are any independent radio stations surviving. They were bought up years ago
Hekate
Oct 2022
#63
I don't know about you guys, but I think we have chased out Democratic money people in
Demsrule86
Oct 2022
#13
I'm sure there is a way to track his donations. Oppo research certainly finds it out fast enough.
Hekate
Oct 2022
#65
We need to be able to fight fire with fire...we will accomplish nothing if we don't have money.
Demsrule86
Oct 2022
#48
Besides Biden, I think Bloomberg was the only one who would have beaten Trump in 2022
Polybius
Oct 2022
#44
He would have had a chance but being from New York like California makes it hard to win a
Demsrule86
Oct 2022
#49
He would have had plenty of money for sure...I always vote Democratic. So he would have had
Demsrule86
Oct 2022
#56
When you have millions of citizens with near zero or no critical thinking skills for themselves,
Justice matters.
Oct 2022
#19
Even Hunt and Brinkley and Walter Cronkite were thought of and smeared as liberal by many.
Ligyron
Oct 2022
#27
I'm with you. Let's see a return of honest journalism instead of 24/7 opinion-entertainment
Just A Box Of Rain
Oct 2022
#38
We don't have a silo...our people get hammered from everyone. MSNBC is not a liberl media source.
Demsrule86
Oct 2022
#50
It seems like progressive billionaires are more focused on saving the environment.
LonePirate
Oct 2022
#15
Maybe because that is a bridge too far & would cut into their wealth by changing society.
NullTuples
Oct 2022
#37
Good question I often ask as well. Most progressive news and commentary behind a pay wall.
Pepsidog
Oct 2022
#31
Because autocratic corporate media monopolies cockblock democratic messaging.
ancianita
Oct 2022
#32
I don't think having a large Lib. Media Outlet would matter. Viewers are going to seek out what
TeamProg
Oct 2022
#34
I'm done waiting for a savior. He ain't coming. We need to do this ourselves, working together.
Midnight Writer
Oct 2022
#41
We have some progressive billionaire/millionaires, but media monopolists would drive them out.
ancianita
Oct 2022
#51
#1 It's their money & they get to decide. #2 Are any of them interested in a media empire?
Hekate
Oct 2022
#57
And if they did there'd be endless complaining, how they hate this or that show, that host,
betsuni
Oct 2022
#61
One possible solution would be for the labor unions to create a media startup--or fund one.
keep_left
Oct 2022
#62
Good information, thank you. Re union YouTube channels, I've looked. The closest I could find
ancianita
Oct 2022
#66