Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,114 posts)
66. True. But having more judges might impact the full court decision
Thu Oct 27, 2022, 03:18 PM
Oct 2022

While Thomas should have recused himself and handed the petition off to another justice, the decision to grant a short administrative stay while the full court considers the emergency stay request probably will be a nothing burger in terms of actual impact. That's because Graham isn't scheduled to give his deposition until November 17 and it is likely that the full court will decide Graham's request before that date. It wouldn't shock me if his request is granted by a majority of the court. But will it be 6-3 or 5-4? If its 5-4 with Thomas in the majority there will be reason for outrage.

One question that needs to be considered: why isn't Fulton County formally requesting that Thomas recuse himself? Are they concerned it would turn him against them? I think its likely that ship already has sailed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So what's the remedy? gab13by13 Oct 2022 #1
Nor could he FBaggins Oct 2022 #3
Not a practical remedy. gab13by13 Oct 2022 #5
In the current situation, there is no remedy Miles Archer Oct 2022 #6
We need to be realistic also. gab13by13 Oct 2022 #8
Not Alito - Thomas FBaggins Oct 2022 #10
Roberts can't do anything Buckeyeblue Oct 2022 #36
Roberts wouldn't be on the court if it weren't for Bush v Gore. LisaM Oct 2022 #53
I guess Dems should've staged massive Stop the Steal Dark n Stormy Knight Oct 2022 #67
We did. We marched on DC and protested RussBLib Oct 2022 #84
Well, maybe that's where we went wrong. Dark n Stormy Knight Oct 2022 #94
Must be nice... SergeStorms Oct 2022 #62
There's the solution. NO MORE lifetime appointments. calimary Oct 2022 #73
There isn't one FBaggins Oct 2022 #9
Tribe is doing an important service for the public, he's not just spitting in the wind. msfiddlestix Oct 2022 #46
You say tomato FBaggins Oct 2022 #47
He's just telling us that the wetness we're feeling is Thomas pissing on us. And there's nothing dem4decades Oct 2022 #86
Here's the whole thing Effete Snob Oct 2022 #11
It's becoming quite clear that our laws are just window dressing to call ourselves a democracy. hadEnuf Oct 2022 #70
Does "AA" signify Alcoholics Anonymous in this context? Effete Snob Oct 2022 #77
African Americans if you will.... hadEnuf Oct 2022 #79
I see.. and Clarence Thomas is not an African American now? Effete Snob Oct 2022 #80
He's wealthy and well connected. He mocks the law. hadEnuf Oct 2022 #85
Okay, so just so I understand you Effete Snob Oct 2022 #87
My first post never mentioned Clarence Thomas. You mentioned him in your reply. hadEnuf Oct 2022 #97
Do you see the subject line of this thread? Effete Snob Oct 2022 #98
You don't tell me what to write. hadEnuf Oct 2022 #99
This message was self-deleted by its author hadEnuf Oct 2022 #72
A well timed aneurysm. Aviation Pro Oct 2022 #18
that remedy is long overdue. FoxNewsSucks Oct 2022 #28
Bingo! mountain grammy Oct 2022 #42
It's not up to Garland DownriverDem Oct 2022 #30
He dies.. mountain grammy Oct 2022 #41
Everyone ship him boxes of high-calorie snack foods and chips! Hieronymus Phact Oct 2022 #71
Tribe says none treestar Oct 2022 #59
"So what's the remedy?" Jack the Greater Oct 2022 #64
let's file an foia request GenXer47 Oct 2022 #2
Does 50 years ago count? rubbersole Oct 2022 #26
Oh, I read this as a "foie request" - a 10 pound order of pate de foie for Justice Thomas erronis Oct 2022 #63
K&R spanone Oct 2022 #4
Tribe is incorrect FBaggins Oct 2022 #7
Tribe cited a federal statute, gab13by13 Oct 2022 #12
And applied it incorrectly. FBaggins Oct 2022 #13
It's not a criminal statute Effete Snob Oct 2022 #15
Because not every federal statute is a criminal statue. onenote Oct 2022 #17
Ima try a longer explanation Effete Snob Oct 2022 #21
Solid - but one addition FBaggins Oct 2022 #37
+1 onenote Oct 2022 #54
It needs a check or balance treestar Oct 2022 #60
It has one FBaggins Oct 2022 #61
Lol - legal fan fiction Effete Snob Oct 2022 #14
Exactly - but it has been tried before FBaggins Oct 2022 #16
Since we are going to see more abortion litigation Effete Snob Oct 2022 #25
Fiction in the sense that it's essentially meaningless? plimsoll Oct 2022 #29
Then the solution is gab13by13 Oct 2022 #19
It's fine Effete Snob Oct 2022 #22
Even more justices would not necessarily have changed what happened here thesquanderer Oct 2022 #32
True. But having more judges might impact the full court decision onenote Oct 2022 #66
Supreme Court Group Photo - 2050 Effete Snob Oct 2022 #45
I favor 15 but could live with SCOTUS looking like the House. Hermit-The-Prog Oct 2022 #76
Using this reasoning, Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett should have recused Lonestarblue Oct 2022 #20
Ah, but you also have to recuse all of the women, no? Effete Snob Oct 2022 #23
The lying, sexual predator, traitor's partner really needs to stop wasting oxygen. niyad Oct 2022 #24
The bottom line is, gab13by13 Oct 2022 #27
You said it. Joinfortmill Oct 2022 #35
It appears you've outlined the only possible correction possible. jaxexpat Oct 2022 #38
"the immediate solution to the problem should be VOTE" Effete Snob Oct 2022 #40
We need to strengthen this statute - ASAP. Joinfortmill Oct 2022 #31
How? FBaggins Oct 2022 #34
And they would be right in doing so Zeitghost Oct 2022 #50
Does anyone know DownriverDem Oct 2022 #33
This was on "The Last Word" ... aggiesal Oct 2022 #39
Ah Lawrence O'Donnell Effete Snob Oct 2022 #43
O'Donnell wasn't the only News Host that said that ... aggiesal Oct 2022 #49
It's the arrogance with which he pronounces his failed predictions which grates on me Effete Snob Oct 2022 #51
Thomas needs to be charged with obstruction of justice. Marius25 Oct 2022 #44
How did he obstruct justice? Did Kagan obstruct justice when she stayed the Kelli Ward subpoena? onenote Oct 2022 #55
I'm trying to understand. Did Kagan or her spouse commit a crime ecstatic Oct 2022 #88
So why hasn't the Fulton prosecutor moved to have Thomas recuse himself onenote Oct 2022 #90
Hell, maybe I'll write a letter asking her to. ecstatic Oct 2022 #92
I imagine that Graham's motion is at the very top of her list of things she's dealing with onenote Oct 2022 #93
Fair enough, but did you deflect my original question? ecstatic Oct 2022 #95
Here's a link to her response. onenote Oct 2022 #96
Thanks for the detailed response. ecstatic Oct 2022 #100
so after reading all the responses. bullimiami Oct 2022 #48
None of that is going to happen. onenote Oct 2022 #56
No of course it isnt. But one can dream of possibilities. bullimiami Oct 2022 #68
I think you came away with a completely wrong take stopdiggin Oct 2022 #82
Tribe is becoming "spit into the wind guy." Scrivener7 Oct 2022 #52
I think that is essentially true stopdiggin Oct 2022 #83
I didn't know this. Seems to be pretty clear and unambiguous. Pepsidog Oct 2022 #57
If you read the various comments you'll see that it is indeed rife with ambiguity onenote Oct 2022 #58
Actually, I usually always read the comments but didn't here. Hard to find Pepsidog Oct 2022 #65
Much of our government is run on the honor system. Where there is no honor, the system breaks down. elias7 Oct 2022 #69
+a billion stage left Oct 2022 #74
Roberts should resign,Biden should correct Obama's error, recess appoint new chief, impeach Thomas bringthePaine Oct 2022 #75
Lol. I wish. Which error did Pres Obama make? ecstatic Oct 2022 #89
When was Biden given the power to impeach Thomas? onenote Oct 2022 #91
Political Voices Network soldierant Oct 2022 #78
Thomas is an ass wipe Justice! BlueJac Oct 2022 #81
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lawrence Tribe: Clarence ...»Reply #66