Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The two things aren't mutually exclusive. It's the Repukes who say it's either-or, it can't be both. But I know a lot of Democrats (myself included) who believe that abortion might be morally wrong, but it's not up to the state or federal government to deny the freedom of choice from any woman and her doctor. Under most circumstances, abortion is the remedy of the last-resort.
But Jim Banks (like the other Repukes) thinks that the entire state has to be anti-choice, because he's anti-choice. He's exercising his own freedom of choice to deny choice to every woman in Indiana.
We have lots of them here in Pennsylvania too. Remember Rick Santorum?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read