Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't think starting WW lll over an errant missile is prudent. [View all]Gore1FL
(22,951 posts)14. You are thinking WW I
WW II started with the Japanese invasion of China.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't think starting WW lll over an errant missile is prudent. [View all]
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2022
OP
Russia didn't go to war with Turkey when it accidentally shot down one of their fighter planes.
DemocratSinceBirth
Nov 2022
#4
+1, Russia was in the middle of committing war crimes and doesn't deserve BoD.
uponit7771
Nov 2022
#23
I'm flabbergasted by some of these posts. Who is crazy enough to be eager to witness WWIII?
tritsofme
Nov 2022
#6
"over an errant missile " ... that's giving Putler et al too much BoD, still not worth WWIII
uponit7771
Nov 2022
#18
Not for the first time, I'm deeply grateful that Joseph Biden is tending the helm of state.
Just A Box Of Rain
Nov 2022
#24
no..but giving Ukraine 50 jets and some long range missiles and some defense systems seems ok...
Sancho
Nov 2022
#30
Turns out to have been a UKR S-300 missile that was fired in self-defense
Just A Box Of Rain
Nov 2022
#43
Hitting a field just inside Poland with intent never made strategic sense to me.
Just A Box Of Rain
Nov 2022
#49