Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(180,298 posts)
24. Iowa caucuses, built on myth, lose place at head of the line
Sat Dec 3, 2022, 03:56 PM
Dec 2022

I think that the OP meant New Hampshire and not Michigan.

I am glad that New Hampshire and Iowa will lose their place as early contests. Neither state represent the demographics of the party.





https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-iowa-barack-obama-des-moines-13ea69a517de07d1622b331feeb08c4d?taid=638b6fe26d9acb00017f2bae&utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter

The caucuses and their outsize importance were largely an exercise in myth-making, that candidates could earn a path to the White House by meeting voters in person where they live, and earnest, civic-minded Midwesterners would brave the winter cold to stand sometimes for hours to discuss issues and literally stand for their candidate.

As the caucuses have played out, the flaws have become glaring. First among them: The state’s Democrats botched the count in 2020, leaving an embarrassing muddle. But there were more. Since 2008, the state’s political makeup has changed dramatically, from a reliable swing state to solidly Republican. And with the Democratic Party increasingly becoming a party of diversity, Iowa’s lack of it left the state without much of a rationale for leading the way.

“We’ve been headed this way for a while,” said Joe Trippi, who managed Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt’s winning Iowa campaign in 1988, adding “2020 broke the camel’s back.”

The Democratic National Committee’s rulemaking arm voted Friday to remove Iowa as the leadoff state in the presidential nominating order and replace it with South Carolina starting in 2024, a dramatic shakeup championed by President Joe Biden to better reflect the party’s deeply diverse electorate.

The caucuses were once a novel effort to expand local participation in national party decision-making, but this vestige of 19th century Midwestern civic engagement has simply been been unable to keep pace with the demands of 21st century national politics.

“The times have changed and maybe it’s time for this nominating process to change,” said Emily Parcell, Obama’s 2008 Iowa political director.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'll be glad to see the end of IA and NH going first bucolic_frolic Dec 2022 #1
Four of the last five in Iowa ended up being the overall nominee MichMan Dec 2022 #3
Or did IA begin a bandwagon that subsequent states followed? bucolic_frolic Dec 2022 #4
What candidates would you have preferred over the ones that won Iowa ? MichMan Dec 2022 #5
We might have won either Gore or Kerry's election with a different candidate. Demsrule86 Dec 2022 #7
That is what I think. They will nominate candidates who won't win...and it will get worse. Demsrule86 Dec 2022 #16
Iowa first intelpug Dec 2022 #34
Only two candidates who won Iowa ended in the White House: Junior in 2000 and Obama in 2008 question everything Dec 2022 #32
Who should Iowa have selected in 2016 ? MichMan Dec 2022 #35
She was not the "wrong" pick. She was my choice in both 2008 and 2016 question everything Dec 2022 #45
Kerry should not have been the nominee Renew Deal Dec 2022 #41
I'm glad that other states are being moved up. yardwork Dec 2022 #2
Iowa needs to go away. No more caucuses. Demsrule86 Dec 2022 #6
Whether Iowa goes first of last, there will be a Caucus... brooklynite Dec 2022 #8
If they have a caucus, then they are out as far as I am concerned. I would rather not count their Demsrule86 Dec 2022 #10
So, you are saying just excise Iowa from the process altogether? Bettie Dec 2022 #37
Also, unless they are first, it really doesn't matter. We have no Democrats in Iowa nationally. Demsrule86 Dec 2022 #12
I would add that it will increasingly lead to unelectable candidates if we continue to allow those Demsrule86 Dec 2022 #9
Democrats have won the popular vote every election since 1992 except 2004 Renew Deal Dec 2022 #42
South Carolina is not a great choice pinkstarburst Dec 2022 #11
SC has voted for the Democratic Presidential nominee only twice in the last 60 years, jalan48 Dec 2022 #13
We need candidates who can appeal to AA. We can't win without them. If a candidate can't get Demsrule86 Dec 2022 #15
So, is SC the only state with AA? jalan48 Dec 2022 #17
It is a really good state for it...because most of the Democrats here are minority. Thus, it clearly Demsrule86 Dec 2022 #20
A point to consider is the structure and strength of the Dem party within the state. Wingus Dingus Dec 2022 #21
I think it shows the preferences of one of the most conservative states in the country and jalan48 Dec 2022 #23
Joe Biden won. Demsrule86 Dec 2022 #26
Why should Nevada and New Hampshire be 2nd and 3rd then? MichMan Dec 2022 #27
I don't see why they should. Demsrule86 Dec 2022 #47
Thanks to 82 year old Clyburn. How long do you think he will be able to round the troops? question everything Dec 2022 #33
If that's the standard, we shouldn't change anything. Renew Deal Dec 2022 #43
It is not about a swing state in this case. It is about seeing if a candidate can win minority Demsrule86 Dec 2022 #14
✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ n/t msfiddlestix Dec 2022 #44
It's about the Dem party taking more control of the process. Wingus Dingus Dec 2022 #18
That is the wrong question. Demsrule86 Dec 2022 #48
IA and NH Determine the Initial Viability of Candidates Indykatie Dec 2022 #19
I'll ask again: name a candidate you like who was "drummed out" due to IA and NH results? brooklynite Dec 2022 #25
Joe Biden Sogo Dec 2022 #39
Nope. Io a in particular with a caucus Demsrule86 Dec 2022 #49
SC is not a representative State either, just for different reasons Tom Rinaldo Dec 2022 #22
Iowa caucuses, built on myth, lose place at head of the line LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2022 #24
How is New Hampshire losing it's early place ? MichMan Dec 2022 #36
I always thought Illinois should be the first state Poiuyt Dec 2022 #28
Be very expensive to run Trenzalore Dec 2022 #30
I wonder if that's why people are opposed to small states being first MichMan Dec 2022 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author MichMan Dec 2022 #50
The first four primaries should be in small states Trenzalore Dec 2022 #29
Flaws in your arguments question everything Dec 2022 #31
There aren't any good answers to this problem Renew Deal Dec 2022 #40
LOL BannonsLiver Dec 2022 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The arguments I hear agai...»Reply #24