Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,310 posts)
12. It is. And they are. Because as the reps of The People they're supposed to make all of it public.
Mon Dec 12, 2022, 06:41 PM
Dec 2022

But we don't know if the Committee has these texts. If they did, I doubt they would be the leakers. Some other third party has done this, and probably not in good faith.

Regardless, when the public evidence comes out that the Jan 6 Committee does have, it's registered in the court of public opinion. And when their criminal referrals go to the DOJ, the Jan 6 Committee's evidence becomes legal evidence used to prosecute for justice. There's no contradiction in how the evidence is used per branch of government.

But if these are leaks of info they don't have, then the DOJ won't want this to be politicized and/or undermine its credibility. Meadows is the only holdout for a reason. As with the Jan 6 Committee, we've yet to know what the DOJ has on him.

During the hearings, however, the naming of names without presenting all the evidence was probably the committee's decision to not open themselves up to defamation suits, and leave their colleagues to be appropriately dealt with by the DOJ. Once it's in DOJ hands, no such claims or suits can be brought.

Which is why their only recourse right now is vengeful investigations and impeachment. They think they've got evidence, once in the majority, but they've really got nothing but the same kinds of empty, failed claims they brought to 60+ courts and circuits over 2020 election results. Their congressional activity is going to be a shitshow.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Lock 'em up. Botany Dec 2022 #1
Well, this could sure be a BFD Fiendish Thingy Dec 2022 #2
Is TPM the only outlet releasing these? Nt Fiendish Thingy Dec 2022 #3
Initially, I believe it's an exclusive. Nevilledog Dec 2022 #4
The release of these to the public could undermine and politicize the DOJ and Jack Smith efforts. ancianita Dec 2022 #6
My understanding is that the January 6th committee was going to make all of ..... mjvpi Dec 2022 #9
It is. And they are. Because as the reps of The People they're supposed to make all of it public. ancianita Dec 2022 #12
DOJ had 2 years MOMFUDSKI Dec 2022 #19
I hear you. The chips are gonna fall with the DOJ. Whether this info leaks to the press or not. ancianita Dec 2022 #20
Well, Well, Well peggysue2 Dec 2022 #5
Here is the link to the messaged from Meadows (posted on CNN): Red Pest Dec 2022 #7
Those are only some of them. Nevilledog Dec 2022 #10
Thank you! Ms. Toad Dec 2022 #11
Did you see this page? I didn't see it the first time I looked at TPM. pnwmom Dec 2022 #13
Nope. Ms. Toad Dec 2022 #14
I suspect they'll be adding more links to this other page, as they report on more emails. pnwmom Dec 2022 #16
I didn't see that either! ShazzieB Dec 2022 #15
I think they'll probably be dropping more stories here: pnwmom Dec 2022 #17
A previous poster was correct in the terminology that must change: Eyeball_Kid Dec 2022 #8
+1000000 crickets Dec 2022 #18
YES! peggysue2 Dec 2022 #21
GOP lawmakers who texted Mark Meadows LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2022 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NEW More Meadows texts: A...»Reply #12