Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is there really ---i mean, really---actually---in real life---anything more necessary before we--- [View all]Justice matters.
(9,976 posts)33. AMEN. What's the difference between aiding and abetting?
Posted on July 22, 2022
Whats the difference between aiding and abetting?
The term aiding and the term abetting are similar legal concepts. But each has a slightly different meaning.
Aiding a crime means helping someone else commit a crime.
Abetting means to encourage or incite a criminal act. Although to abet does not necessarily mean that you help or facilitate its execution.
Both aiding and abetting are crimes and forms of accomplice liability. A conviction usually comes with the same penalties as the underlying offense.
While the crime is often referred to as aiding and abetting, either one suffices.
You can be liable if you aid a criminal activity, or if you abet in it.
https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/blog/criminal-defense/difference-between-aiding-and-abetting/
Whats the difference between aiding and abetting?
The term aiding and the term abetting are similar legal concepts. But each has a slightly different meaning.
Aiding a crime means helping someone else commit a crime.
Abetting means to encourage or incite a criminal act. Although to abet does not necessarily mean that you help or facilitate its execution.
Both aiding and abetting are crimes and forms of accomplice liability. A conviction usually comes with the same penalties as the underlying offense.
While the crime is often referred to as aiding and abetting, either one suffices.
You can be liable if you aid a criminal activity, or if you abet in it.
https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/blog/criminal-defense/difference-between-aiding-and-abetting/
The Constitutions Disqualification Clause Can Be Enforced Today
BY LIZ HEMPOWICZ & DAVID JANOVSKY & NORMAN EISEN | FILED UNDER REPORT | NOVEMBER 15, 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Background on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment
Existing Enforcement Mechanisms
How the Select Committee Can Encourage Section 3 Enforcement
Red Herrings
Conclusion
Introduction
The attack on the United States Capitol complex to disrupt the certification of the 2020 presidential election on January 6, 2021, led to the first application of the disqualification clause contained in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment in more than a century. Section 3 prohibits public office holders who have taken an oath to support the U.S. Constitution and then engage in insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or who give aid or comfort to enemies of the United States, from serving in public office.
The analysis in this report will build on the established collective understanding of Section 3 to guide contemporary application of the clause. The report will specifically prescribe how the disqualification clause can currently be enforced against individuals involved in the January 6 attack.
https://www.pogo.org/report/2022/11/the-constitutions-disqualification-clause-can-be-enforced-today#:~:text=Section%203%20of%20the%2014th%20Amendment%20was%20ratified%20shortly%20after,voted%20to%20allow%20such%20service.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Is there really ---i mean, really---actually---in real life---anything more necessary before we--- [View all]
Atticus
Dec 2022
OP
Amen. The fact that so many people just roll over for these Republicans is disgusting.
ck4829
Dec 2022
#2
It will be "proven in a court of law":only if WE insist on it. If the PTB think we don't care---
Atticus
Dec 2022
#6
Good for you. Now, if you will READ the OP, it specifically "leaves aside" whether they should be
Atticus
Dec 2022
#14
Then the OP should also be concerned with abiding by the law on OUR side...
brooklynite
Dec 2022
#18
I think many are not of the opinion that we currently HAVE an "independent judiciary". If that was
Atticus
Dec 2022
#53
You have nit-picked, deflected and avoided the question posed. Isn't that called a "hat trick"? nt
Atticus
Dec 2022
#58
Exactly - and indeed. How we can allow election deniers to serve is totally beyond me.
NewHendoLib
Dec 2022
#7
FWIW, 'insurrection" is not the sole reason set forth in the 14th Amendment that can bar
Atticus
Dec 2022
#22
I'll just say what anyone who can read might say: you know better than that. nt
Atticus
Dec 2022
#46
in earlier days, a "necktie party" would be over, new laws implemented by now - just sayin'...
bringthePaine
Dec 2022
#20