Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(380 posts)

1. I would be concerned

Wed Nov 7, 2012, 02:12 PM

Nov 2012

About that triggering a back and forth. When the tables are turned that would end up being the fate of our candidate

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should the DoJ go after Romney after all that's come to light? [View all] BarackTheVote Nov 2012 OP

I would be concerned Livluvgrow Nov 2012 #1

My fear would then be BarackTheVote Nov 2012 #8

They do it all the time. Are you kidding? Remember Clinton? Gary Hart? robinlynne Nov 2012 #11

right. That's going to happen. librechik Nov 2012 #2

ABSOLUTELY! bongbong Nov 2012 #3

yes Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #4

of course they should no one is (supposed to be) above the law leftyohiolib Nov 2012 #5

Hell ya! Baitball Blogger Nov 2012 #6

No Corgigal Nov 2012 #9

If he's broken a law and it's within statute of limitations - yes LeftInTX Nov 2012 #10

and John Husted. and the privately run elections..... robinlynne Nov 2012 #12

YES --- but he should be allowed to pay his way out. Tigress DEM Nov 2012 #13