General Discussion

getagrip_already

(17,802 posts)

36. Nope, don't play one on the internet either... ;)

Reply to ancianita (Reply #32)

Fri Jan 6, 2023, 05:27 PM

Jan 2023

Just listen to them when they pipe up.

They are normally pretty quick to put nonsense in its place though.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Treason Caucus, sworn in or not, will be indicted by Jack Smith. [View all] ancianita Jan 2023 OP

SC Smith has got this! SheltieLover Jan 2023 #1

Only 1 possible sitting member of Congress may be indicted, Scott Perry. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #2

Why only Scott Perry and not the others? ancianita Jan 2023 #4

can the OP provide a link to the post please ??????? Trueblue1968 Jan 2023 #57

possible republianmushroom Jan 2023 #3

Can they ignore his subpoena ? Beachnutt Jan 2023 #5

Whose? ancianita Jan 2023 #6

A subpoena from the DOJ Beachnutt Jan 2023 #18

They can ignore it, then get held in contempt by a court, and then made to show up, or go to jail. ancianita Jan 2023 #19

I wouldn't advise it, lol. The feds have more teeth than Congress. catbyte Jan 2023 #10

I'll believe it when I see it. Marius25 Jan 2023 #7

Uh oh, Trump's little buddies won't like this one. Kingofalldems Jan 2023 #8

Hope So malaise Jan 2023 #9

just a nit.... getagrip_already Jan 2023 #11

well, ancianita Jan 2023 #13

just curious.... getagrip_already Jan 2023 #21

They ancianita Jan 2023 #23

I didn't say they "couldn't be".... getagrip_already Jan 2023 #24

You're confusing me. No one can not show up to a grand jury. Period. ancianita Jan 2023 #26

i'll try to break it down.... getagrip_already Jan 2023 #30

Okay. Thanks. So from what I've read about Special Counsel powers, there won't be any problems. ancianita Jan 2023 #32

Nope, don't play one on the internet either... ;) getagrip_already Jan 2023 #36

If someone goes in front of a GJ and pleads the 5th, Prairie_Seagull Jan 2023 #62

Not sure of the question but... getagrip_already Jan 2023 #64

Even a few would be great. We need laws that enable charging Hortensis Jan 2023 #12

The good news is that if he's got enough to nail a couple, he can nail them all. ancianita Jan 2023 #14

That would be GREAT! Hortensis Jan 2023 #15

I sure as hell hope so. GoCubsGo Jan 2023 #16

I loathe her so much, but I gotta say, her name hasn't come up in the last year. ancianita Jan 2023 #17

I'm starting to wonder if she'll even finish out her term. GoCubsGo Jan 2023 #20

She will. ancianita Jan 2023 #22

Did I miss a public statement from his office today? msfiddlestix Jan 2023 #25

No, you didn't. It's just that there's been talk about the "Treason Caucus," and I just ancianita Jan 2023 #28

oh gothcha, thought I missed a mighty big announcement that I was not expecting.. msfiddlestix Jan 2023 #38

Yes! - No Speaker can stop it from happening FakeNoose Jan 2023 #27

Nope! ancianita Jan 2023 #29

Not gonna happen Polybius Jan 2023 #31

Whatever gets them into jail sooner. calimary Jan 2023 #33

And none of them will be removed from office. n/t Mr.Bill Jan 2023 #34

Spare me. Tell it to Jack Smith. ancianita Jan 2023 #37

He can't do anything to remove them from Congress. tritsofme Jan 2023 #51

If they're sentenced to jail, I've read that they could still participate in Congress, maybe. Sure. ancianita Jan 2023 #55

Kevin won't be like Jack. Jack will only let them choose where they do time. Maybe. Kennah Jan 2023 #35

This is only the four millioneth or so such prediction. PoindexterOglethorpe Jan 2023 #39

PUH-LEASE. ancianita Jan 2023 #43

Meanwhile, Trump, PoindexterOglethorpe Jan 2023 #63

Yes, ancianita Jan 2023 #65

Because we're Democrats we're not supposed to disagree with your opinion? onenote Jan 2023 #40

Go for it. I'll wait. ancianita Jan 2023 #44

People state their own opinions, they don't hold back because some poster says they don't want onenote Jan 2023 #45

Yes, they do. Venting is common around here. ancianita Jan 2023 #47

Except you didn't want to hear any disagreement, fact based or otherwise. onenote Jan 2023 #49

Who would. I get disagreement regularly, fact based or otherwise. ancianita Jan 2023 #52

A bit late to walk back your demand. onenote Jan 2023 #53

What demand. The one with "please" in it? ancianita Jan 2023 #54

You've got issues. ancianita Jan 2023 #56

They don't compare to yours, I think onenote Jan 2023 #58

Nope H2O Man Jan 2023 #41

...whatever outcome the facts and the law dictate." progressoid Jan 2023 #42

Yeah, whatever. ancianita Jan 2023 #46

OK. progressoid Jan 2023 #48

Court rulings: ancianita Jan 2023 #50

No. H2O Man Jan 2023 #59

Yes. ancianita Jan 2023 #60

Okay. ancianita Jan 2023 #61