General Discussion

sheshe2

(96,696 posts)

48. Edited.

Reply to former9thward (Reply #29)

Tue Jan 10, 2023, 12:25 AM

Jan 2023

I meant to write 2.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just wondering, are we still supporting Merrick Garland on this Forum? [View all] Tacan Jan 2023 OP

Why? live love laugh Jan 2023 #1

I'm tired of his inaction. Tacan Jan 2023 #3

Absence of public information is not evidence of inaction Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #36

Maybe you're tired of believing there's no action going on because he's not making noise Bucky Jan 2023 #54

I am. Joe Biden chose him and that's all I need to know. Joinfortmill Jan 2023 #2

+1 happybird Jan 2023 #5

I am.. agingdem Jan 2023 #4

His work. Lunabell Jan 2023 #6

Of course. GP6971 Jan 2023 #7

Who? JohnSJ Jan 2023 #8

I think people expect all kinds of leaks to let us know what is going on.. LakeArenal Jan 2023 #9

Go watch NCIS. I hear they wrap everything up at the end of the hour. FSogol Jan 2023 #10

cheers jcgoldie Jan 2023 #13

Yeah, 2 years is nothing. iemanja Jan 2023 #16

Two years is nothing when you look at history Genki Hikari Jan 2023 #37

You're comparing 1 hour newdayneeded Jan 2023 #39

Don't do that Bucky Jan 2023 #60

Biden appointed him and that's good enough for me. Ocelot II Jan 2023 #11

Why wouldn't we support him? Deuxcents Jan 2023 #12

Jack Smith True Dough Jan 2023 #14

Isn't the person in question now Jack Smith? iemanja Jan 2023 #15

I read it on here that Smith will newdayneeded Jan 2023 #40

Yes, but Garland is waiting for Smith's recommendation iemanja Jan 2023 #65

I am. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #17

Do you also support the 20 Republican Senators who voted to confirm him? gab13by13 Jan 2023 #22

Five years! LOL former9thward Jan 2023 #29

Garlands waiting for a repub newdayneeded Jan 2023 #43

WTF Genki Hikari Jan 2023 #44

Edited. sheshe2 Jan 2023 #48

Yes Bev54 Jan 2023 #18

Fani Willis got through all of the red tape. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #23

One case to investigate and not 25 lawyers going to court to fight subpoenas. Bev54 Jan 2023 #35

One doesn't defy a federal subpoena, gab13by13 Jan 2023 #45

One fights it in court as we have seen, even with the secret court hearing these cases Bev54 Jan 2023 #52

You're comparing apples and oranges. Genki Hikari Jan 2023 #46

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #55

I Never Expected Him To Indict Teflon Man To Begin With SoCalDavidS Jan 2023 #19

Joe Biden appointed him. Also that thing about NCIS wrapping up things in an hour pertains. Hekate Jan 2023 #20

Watergate did not take five years. former9thward Jan 2023 #31

Stop. Seriously Genki Hikari Jan 2023 #47

Burglary was in 1972. Haldeman & Mitchell (the biggest fish caught) didn't go to prison till 1977. Bucky Jan 2023 #57

Sorry, former9th -- "a long time" Hekate Jan 2023 #61

Anyone who understands how complicated this is does nini Jan 2023 #21

I agree with the seditious conspiracy case, gab13by13 Jan 2023 #25

The stolen docs case is not complicated. brush Jan 2023 #34

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #56

I do in general mvd Jan 2023 #24

Let's Not Forget That DOJ Recently Announced They Were Investigating Hunter Biden nt SoCalDavidS Jan 2023 #27

Yeah, Garland took over the Biden case from the Archives gab13by13 Jan 2023 #30

And he was quick to appoint Bettie Jan 2023 #64

What choice do we have? liberalmediaaddict Jan 2023 #26

Glenn Kirschner Would Have Been An Excellent Pick SoCalDavidS Jan 2023 #28

I still go back to 20 Republicans voting to confirm Garland, gab13by13 Jan 2023 #32

A high number according to whom? Genki Hikari Jan 2023 #51

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Jan 2023 #58

Yes, of course.. anyone who Cha Jan 2023 #33

That's pretty trollish of you RussBLib Jan 2023 #38

Yep Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2023 #49

I can't assume it's trollish, meaning disingenuous. But it does ask for groupthink. Bucky Jan 2023 #59

It will take courage. I understand when someone is hesitant. Frasier Balzov Jan 2023 #41

Of course n/t Lucinda Jan 2023 #42

Yes. ismnotwasm Jan 2023 #50

Yes. All the way. 100%. Even if he doesn't do what I want ColinC Jan 2023 #53

What's your alternative? herding cats Jan 2023 #62

All this Hekate Jan 2023 #63