Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Stoned California Seniors Headed to ER's By the Thousands: UCSD Study [View all]cate94
(3,071 posts)76. There is a solution without going to the E.R.
Eat a peppercorn. This is advice from David Crosby, if I recall correctly. A friend of mine called me in severe distress, and I told her to try it, she argued, I said what have you got to lose? It worked. I personally have never needed it, but it certainly cant hurt you.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
160 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
yea i know about the increased potency - i feel it's probably the edibles. you have better control
Fullduplexxx
Jan 2023
#42
I take 5mg for sleep pretty often. Hardly feel high at all but it knocks me right out. nt
Quixote1818
Jan 2023
#72
Weed in the 70s & 80s was nowhere near 20% THC. Most were 1 to 5% with an 8 to 10% (rare) max range
Celerity
Jan 2023
#74
I noticed that between late 60s and early 90s (when I occasionally smoked a joint)
fierywoman
Jan 2023
#79
Infographics like this one are comparing the results of "illicit samples" the 1970's
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#106
Weed had already grown more potent long before legal dispensaries came into existence in the US.
Celerity
Jan 2023
#107
Both. And in terms of "potency" is is more a matter of the balance of canabloids
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#150
Sativas are NOT the strains that are high in THC, INDICAS are. I know because they are what I used
The_REAL_Ecumenist
Jan 2023
#80
The "Internets" are WRONG. Now, while there may be hybrids of sativa & indica strains that have
The_REAL_Ecumenist
Jan 2023
#157
I learned the hard way, 80% tincture + edibles... see post at end of this thread.
msfiddlestix
Jan 2023
#121
I haven't smoked any pot in a long, long time. The last time I did, I became very uncomfortably
Chainfire
Jan 2023
#9
Bazinga..this crap was in the news when MJ was being legalized...so stupid
asiliveandbreathe
Jan 2023
#16
They probably just admitted to smoking/using cannabis when asked the basic questions.
MrsCoffee
Jan 2023
#127
You are onto something ..how often was the question asked in years gone
asiliveandbreathe
Jan 2023
#130
I would suggest that you find some back issues of High Times magazine from 1979
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#65
No, what's good evidence is people who were there telling you what time it is.
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#70
Grown outdoors means that a plant is started in early spring and allowed to mature
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#77
You horticultural failures are your own. It isn't only about growing outdoors,
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#84
No, you just don't know what you are talking about when it comes to this subject,
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#87
I'm sorry that you deride those of us who have actual experience in the matter.
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#103
And classic (all sativa) red-haired California Sinsemilla dripping with resin.
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#48
Well, yeah, we were good for the times, the very best, but things have changed.
Roisin Ni Fiachra
Jan 2023
#117
The hybridization (with skunk weed aka Indica) killed off those classic sativa strains.
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#124
Sinsemilla simply means "without seeds", it is not a strain of cannabis.
Roisin Ni Fiachra
Jan 2023
#126
CA Sinsemilla was a stain of pure sativa. People did not use the term "strain" back in the day
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#129
Then where did the "California Pure Sativa Sinsemilla Strain" originate?
Roisin Ni Fiachra
Jan 2023
#134
I don't know where the original variety that came to be known as CA Sinsemilla originated.
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#135
I retain some skepticism of this account as the Oaxacan herb of that era was
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#139
Sometimes, the edibles take a long time to take effect, and then people eat more ...
Earth-shine
Jan 2023
#52
Yes, I am tempted to try the modern edibles - at least I'll know what I'm getting
csziggy
Jan 2023
#158
Makes me want to try some of the "good stuff" I think I could handle it responsibly.
walkingman
Jan 2023
#20
We had better herb in the mid-70s here in CA than what's sold in dispensaries today.
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#67
To my mind there are three components that made golden age sinsemilla so great.
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#133
Yes, the long growing season of classic CA Sinsemilla makes its cultivation more difficult.
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#149
It's a potency issue. Today's products are one-hit typically, especially for older folks.
Evolve Dammit
Jan 2023
#45
People who are now "old folks" and were well connected, smoked better herb in the mid-1970s
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#59
Had all of those and appreciated each and every one. The new stuff is potent. Hopefully no paraquat
Evolve Dammit
Jan 2023
#153
The new stuff is potent. It just tends to be "down" rather than "up."
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#155
To be fair, the article does say some seniors are experimenting with it for "palliative care"
dflprincess
Jan 2023
#66
It's overdosing on the Edibles and Tincture. I was almost one of those Seniors, EMT's came to me
msfiddlestix
Jan 2023
#120