Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hakeem Jeffries Stumps for Conservative Judge [View all]Kid Berwyn
(24,555 posts)29. Big deal.
Hector LaSalle is not fit to be chief judge of New York's Court of Appeals
Opinion, Stephen Hart
January 5, 2023 Updated 15 hrs ago
Excerpt
On abortion, when the New York City Council uncovered what appeared to be fraudulent practices by a crisis pregnancy center, the state attorney general launched an investigation. LaSalle intervened, hamstringing the investigation. He did not allow the AG to examine even the centers promotional materials. His solicitude for the center suggests that he is not prepared to fully honor reproductive rights, which are now embedded in our states constitution.
Unions and their officials are protected by state law from lawsuits in state court stemming from their organizing activities. Our courts have consistently upheld this law. But LaSalle created a workaround. He allowed Cablevision to sue, for defamation, two officials at the union representing its workers, on the theory that they were being sued in their individual rather than union-official capacity, even though the allegedly defamatory statements related to issues between the union and the corporation. This decision was not only anti-labor, but also went beyond the constitutional role of the judiciary. In effect, LaSalle changed the law of the state, something only the Legislature is entitled to do.
Due process for defendants in criminal cases is also vulnerable under LaSalles decision-making. Our state, to its credit, has stringent rules about self-incrimination, probable cause for arrests, conditions attached to plea bargains, and many other subjects. Due process is not a technicality, but a guardian of liberty, protecting every one of us against unjust arrest or conviction. LaSalle, perhaps because his career has mostly been as a prosecutor, has shown himself willing to apply due process rules very loosely, giving police and prosecutors slack to which they are not entitled, and do not get from most New York judges.
LaSalle is not a middle-of-the-road judge, let alone a champion for New Yorks values. He is not the right person to head our highest court. The State Senate should refuse to confirm him, after which the governor should nominate someone better.
Source:
https://www.salamancapress.com/news/state/another-voice-hector-lasalle-is-not-fit-to-be-chief-judge-of-new-yorks-court/article_9465c01f-7441-52ef-b5ea-bcd3022a8be0.html
Stephen Hart, Ph.D., is adjunct associate professor of sociology at the University at Buffalo.
Ill go with Prof. Hart on this one. Thanks for the links!
Opinion, Stephen Hart
January 5, 2023 Updated 15 hrs ago
Excerpt
On abortion, when the New York City Council uncovered what appeared to be fraudulent practices by a crisis pregnancy center, the state attorney general launched an investigation. LaSalle intervened, hamstringing the investigation. He did not allow the AG to examine even the centers promotional materials. His solicitude for the center suggests that he is not prepared to fully honor reproductive rights, which are now embedded in our states constitution.
Unions and their officials are protected by state law from lawsuits in state court stemming from their organizing activities. Our courts have consistently upheld this law. But LaSalle created a workaround. He allowed Cablevision to sue, for defamation, two officials at the union representing its workers, on the theory that they were being sued in their individual rather than union-official capacity, even though the allegedly defamatory statements related to issues between the union and the corporation. This decision was not only anti-labor, but also went beyond the constitutional role of the judiciary. In effect, LaSalle changed the law of the state, something only the Legislature is entitled to do.
Due process for defendants in criminal cases is also vulnerable under LaSalles decision-making. Our state, to its credit, has stringent rules about self-incrimination, probable cause for arrests, conditions attached to plea bargains, and many other subjects. Due process is not a technicality, but a guardian of liberty, protecting every one of us against unjust arrest or conviction. LaSalle, perhaps because his career has mostly been as a prosecutor, has shown himself willing to apply due process rules very loosely, giving police and prosecutors slack to which they are not entitled, and do not get from most New York judges.
LaSalle is not a middle-of-the-road judge, let alone a champion for New Yorks values. He is not the right person to head our highest court. The State Senate should refuse to confirm him, after which the governor should nominate someone better.
Source:
https://www.salamancapress.com/news/state/another-voice-hector-lasalle-is-not-fit-to-be-chief-judge-of-new-yorks-court/article_9465c01f-7441-52ef-b5ea-bcd3022a8be0.html
Stephen Hart, Ph.D., is adjunct associate professor of sociology at the University at Buffalo.
Ill go with Prof. Hart on this one. Thanks for the links!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When something sounds totally unbelievable (such as the charge that Jeffries is advancing
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#5
Any Dem who is in leadership and supports ANYONE who is anti abortion, anti labor and anti due
Autumn
Jan 2023
#3
What's an insult is piling on to an attack on Jefferies, the Democratic governor of NY, and
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#7
I certainly looked at it. There are several articles from various sources saying the same thing. nt
Autumn
Jan 2023
#14
You need to look at the actual cases and not what some fringe sources such as Common Dreams
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#16
I don't have to, other authors have done the research. Several of them. I'll take their word for it
Autumn
Jan 2023
#17
Sure, let other people (who have an anti-Democratic agenda to push) do one's thinking.
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#19
No. Repetitions of false claims that DO NOT address the particulars of Evergreen
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#46
So, instead of ripping those who disagree, show something to support the Judge.
Kid Berwyn
Jan 2023
#24
You told me it wasn't your job when I asked you to show me where the article was wrong about
Autumn
Jan 2023
#30
Reading his replies to me is all that matters to me. You want to show where I'm lying?
Autumn
Jan 2023
#52
From the article-it quotes Politico-not sure if that's one of our banned sources.
jalan48
Jan 2023
#12
They are spinning the matter in the most grotesque and dishonest fashion imaginable.
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#18
I realize Common Dreams is problematic, but the judge does seem problematic
LymphocyteLover
Jan 2023
#33
There are other sources attacking LaSalle based on the same flawed reasoning.
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#34
Sorry. But the more you dig into this story, the worse it will look for "Common Dreams."
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#38
What does a list of funders have to do with whether a company is practicing medicine
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#59
Exactly. Which is why the post saying endorsers of Lasalle have "centrist disease" is ridiculous
onenote
Jan 2023
#67
The "disease" is reckless outfits like Common Dreams who seek to sabotage our party
Just A Box Of Rain
Jan 2023
#64