General Discussion

gab13by13

(32,360 posts)

13. I stand up for the J6 committee,

Wed Jan 18, 2023, 09:12 AM

Jan 2023

it put DOJ to shame with far less resources and power.

Why was DOJ 2nd to subpoena Cassisdy Hutchinson? Every former prosecutor who I see on Nicolle Wallace says that it is not like DOJ to be behind in investigations, it wants to be first, and contrary to hope and encouragement DOJ did not investigate Trump and his inner circle for at least a year, we have proof of that from the people that Jack Smith is now investigating.

I have faith and encouragement in Jack Smith. I have faith and encouragement in Fani Willis and Letitia James, and Roberta Kaplan.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The J6 committee may have given us a clue by something they did not do during the hearings. [View all] fightforfreedom Jan 2023 OP

The J6 committee is a legislative committee with oversight. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #1

Huh..."beef". What a strange choice of word in this context. ret5hd Jan 2023 #3

Exactly. Joinfortmill Jan 2023 #7

Something they did not do is not true, gab13by13 Jan 2023 #12

Smith's subpoenas regarding the Willard Hotel are the Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #21

You missed the entire point of my post. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #4

You are the one with the beef with Garland/DOJ. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #10

I stand up for the J6 committee, gab13by13 Jan 2023 #13

Everything you bring up is speculation. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #24

Give me one name. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #28

I already have in a past post. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #29

what we do know about investigations rampartc Jan 2023 #2

Congress cannot stop the investigations. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #6

Yes! Keep saying it until it sinks in. Joinfortmill Jan 2023 #8

you are an optimist rampartc Jan 2023 #9

Yes, yes, and yes. Justice is coming. I know it in my bones and most of you do, too. Joinfortmill Jan 2023 #5

"Picking the right guy for the job" two years too late Goodheart Jan 2023 #11

Complacency is our worst enemy. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #14

Since when is being adamant on any subject makes this subject factual? Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #22

This! And those who have been pushing for complacency here Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #23

Wow, amazing, gab13by13 Jan 2023 #30

I am not aware of a single person pushing for complacency here. Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #41

To rush an investigation through, one must first start investigating. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #45

As a general statement, it is self evident. But I suspect you didn't intend to make Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #49

The "troll" referenced had two DU accounts Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #57

Thanks for clarifying. Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #58

What you call "a push for complacency " is actually a principled stand against uninformed impatience Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #55

I'm editing this. I apologize for being dismissive and flip. I just don't see any reason Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #61

Once again, you are treating educated opinions as facts. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #26

Garland is doing nothing now, he gave the job to Jack Smith. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #31

That is ridiculous. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #38

That's convenient. We should all just trust the plan, huh? But why should we? Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #40

IMO it is a right wing talking point. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #46

Picking the right guy at the right time, on the other hand, is inspiring indeed. Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #17

All of what you say is what Trump's strategy is, to delay everything. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #32

How so? Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #47

Boom, good post. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #53

I saw the piece about Jack Smith... kentuck Jan 2023 #15

Jack Smith is the best person available to go after Trump. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #33

January 6th was 2 years ago, did anyone order the Willard to preserve records? dem4decades Jan 2023 #16

The logical response to your question is, Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #18

IMO, the talking point that gab13by13 Jan 2023 #19

It is an absurd talking point. We didn't see evidence of an Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #25

That is factual incorrect. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #42

Sure he did. Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #43

Look it up. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #44

"It was reported a long time ago that Garland opened an investigation Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #50

No, I do not see anything thing wrong with that sentence. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #54

So are you. And on a lot less evidence. Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #60

I am not speculating in that sentence, it is a fact. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #62

Yes I do. Because there was no proof. There were some reports in the media that Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #63

Garland raided Clarks home last June. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #56

Tell me who knew Garland was investigating the Biden documents since November. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #27

Lots of fascinating stuff there, looking forward to a good movie, Hortensis Jan 2023 #20

Seditious conspiracy is extremely difficult to prove. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #36

The hotel has a right to privacy for their clients. JohnnyRingo Jan 2023 #34

Once DOJ obtains a search warrant gab13by13 Jan 2023 #37

Yes. Those who read Seth Abramson know there's a LOT there. nt wiggs Jan 2023 #35

Because mainstream rethugs were there and they were off limits because of Liz Chaney JT45242 Jan 2023 #39

I partially agree with you, gab13by13 Jan 2023 #48

Seth Abramson wrote extensively about Danascot Jan 2023 #51

If this were an OP, I'd rec it! Thanks. Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #52

Fantastic post, thanks. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #59

There's a lot of rats associated with this particular Willard. SeattleVet Jan 2023 #64

K & R malaise Jan 2023 #65