General Discussion

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)

26. Once again, you are treating educated opinions as facts.

Reply to gab13by13 (Reply #14)

Wed Jan 18, 2023, 10:26 AM

Jan 2023

Wallace has no idea what Garland has been doing or is doing now.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The J6 committee may have given us a clue by something they did not do during the hearings. [View all] fightforfreedom Jan 2023 OP

The J6 committee is a legislative committee with oversight. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #1

Huh..."beef". What a strange choice of word in this context. ret5hd Jan 2023 #3

Exactly. Joinfortmill Jan 2023 #7

Something they did not do is not true, gab13by13 Jan 2023 #12

Smith's subpoenas regarding the Willard Hotel are the Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #21

You missed the entire point of my post. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #4

You are the one with the beef with Garland/DOJ. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #10

I stand up for the J6 committee, gab13by13 Jan 2023 #13

Everything you bring up is speculation. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #24

Give me one name. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #28

I already have in a past post. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #29

what we do know about investigations rampartc Jan 2023 #2

Congress cannot stop the investigations. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #6

Yes! Keep saying it until it sinks in. Joinfortmill Jan 2023 #8

you are an optimist rampartc Jan 2023 #9

Yes, yes, and yes. Justice is coming. I know it in my bones and most of you do, too. Joinfortmill Jan 2023 #5

"Picking the right guy for the job" two years too late Goodheart Jan 2023 #11

Complacency is our worst enemy. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #14

Since when is being adamant on any subject makes this subject factual? Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #22

This! And those who have been pushing for complacency here Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #23

Wow, amazing, gab13by13 Jan 2023 #30

I am not aware of a single person pushing for complacency here. Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #41

To rush an investigation through, one must first start investigating. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #45

As a general statement, it is self evident. But I suspect you didn't intend to make Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #49

The "troll" referenced had two DU accounts Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #57

Thanks for clarifying. Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #58

What you call "a push for complacency " is actually a principled stand against uninformed impatience Fiendish Thingy Jan 2023 #55

I'm editing this. I apologize for being dismissive and flip. I just don't see any reason Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #61

Once again, you are treating educated opinions as facts. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #26

Garland is doing nothing now, he gave the job to Jack Smith. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #31

That is ridiculous. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #38

That's convenient. We should all just trust the plan, huh? But why should we? Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #40

IMO it is a right wing talking point. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #46

Picking the right guy at the right time, on the other hand, is inspiring indeed. Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #17

All of what you say is what Trump's strategy is, to delay everything. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #32

How so? Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #47

Boom, good post. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #53

I saw the piece about Jack Smith... kentuck Jan 2023 #15

Jack Smith is the best person available to go after Trump. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #33

January 6th was 2 years ago, did anyone order the Willard to preserve records? dem4decades Jan 2023 #16

The logical response to your question is, Beastly Boy Jan 2023 #18

IMO, the talking point that gab13by13 Jan 2023 #19

It is an absurd talking point. We didn't see evidence of an Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #25

That is factual incorrect. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #42

Sure he did. Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #43

Look it up. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #44

"It was reported a long time ago that Garland opened an investigation Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #50

No, I do not see anything thing wrong with that sentence. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #54

So are you. And on a lot less evidence. Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #60

I am not speculating in that sentence, it is a fact. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #62

Yes I do. Because there was no proof. There were some reports in the media that Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #63

Garland raided Clarks home last June. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #56

Tell me who knew Garland was investigating the Biden documents since November. fightforfreedom Jan 2023 #27

Lots of fascinating stuff there, looking forward to a good movie, Hortensis Jan 2023 #20

Seditious conspiracy is extremely difficult to prove. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #36

The hotel has a right to privacy for their clients. JohnnyRingo Jan 2023 #34

Once DOJ obtains a search warrant gab13by13 Jan 2023 #37

Yes. Those who read Seth Abramson know there's a LOT there. nt wiggs Jan 2023 #35

Because mainstream rethugs were there and they were off limits because of Liz Chaney JT45242 Jan 2023 #39

I partially agree with you, gab13by13 Jan 2023 #48

Seth Abramson wrote extensively about Danascot Jan 2023 #51

If this were an OP, I'd rec it! Thanks. Scrivener7 Jan 2023 #52

Fantastic post, thanks. gab13by13 Jan 2023 #59

There's a lot of rats associated with this particular Willard. SeattleVet Jan 2023 #64

K & R malaise Jan 2023 #65