The J6 committee may have given us a clue by something they did not do during the hearings.

[Fiendish Thingy]

55. What you call "a push for complacency " is actually a principled stand against uninformed impatience

Such as opposing Statements declaring the Certainty of a negative outcome based on an absence of public information.

Opposing statements like “Garland has done nothing for two years, and will never hold Trump accountable” is not advocating complacency, it is an acknowledgement of the uncertainty that comes with the lack of public information during an ongoing investigation. It’s not a disagreement over opinions, it is a challenging of statements set forth as verified facts.

Unlike those who cannot tolerate the uncertainty of the moment and judge Garland as derelict because they haven’t yet enjoyed the vengeance satisfying perp walk or mug shot, I am willing to acknowledge there is much we do not know at this time (although the body of public information is gradually growing).

Acknowledging uncertainty and an awareness that much is still not known about this investigation is not complacency, it’s rationality.