Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Statute of limitations on Trump over Stormy Daniels [View all]wnylib
(21,457 posts)3. Perhaps that is true on federal charges
but NY can still proceed.
People who say that the federal statute of limitations has run out regarding Trump and Stormy Daniels may be accurate. But when they say it about Bragg, which I have seen, they are incorrect.
The reason that I checked on it is because I had read so many times how Bragg had let the time run out and could not understand how he could be sending it to a grand jury if that was true.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I did not say otherwise. But it IS TRUE that the Federal Statute of Limitations has run.
hlthe2b
Jan 2023
#4
I get that, but it is relevant that the Federal SOL has run. To the extent Trump's lawyers are ever
hlthe2b
Jan 2023
#7
I agree. The problem is the "not charging a sitting President" is a DOJ policy based on a poorly
hlthe2b
Jan 2023
#12
The discussion was on revisiting the policy with the DOJ Office of Legal Counsel for new analysis.
hlthe2b
Jan 2023
#19