Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

When Garland punted to some back bencher it was clear the fix was in. Blues Heron Feb 2023 #1
Jack Smith is a back bencher? Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #5
I do not agree with the sentiments of this thread, gab13by13 Feb 2023 #7
It was noth about the capacity of DOJ to handle things. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #23
And, boy, did it sure stop all of those things! W_HAMILTON Feb 2023 #33
DU doesn't count. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #52
Jack 48656c6c6f20 Feb 2023 #20
An Essay on Criticism bigtree Feb 2023 #30
Jack Smith was supposed to come in from The Hague & start smiting moneychangers in the Temple? Hekate Feb 2023 #55
Mahalo, Hekae.. For explaining Cha Feb 2023 #59
There are days (or in this case, nights) that really make you wonder... Hekate Feb 2023 #60
Yes, Great timing Cha Feb 2023 #68
They proceed with caution bucolic_frolic Feb 2023 #2
I knew a guy that was so cautious, he never got anywhere. dem4decades Feb 2023 #8
Hey, now! These things take time! Silent3 Feb 2023 #3
... BlackSkimmer Feb 2023 #4
LOL, lot of i's to dot and t's to cross Emile Feb 2023 #6
Must be careful gab13by13 Feb 2023 #11
His need to show impartiality is to the nation and its future. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #18
The nation, be specific gab13by13 Feb 2023 #19
The nation in historical sense. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #22
Yes but democracy is expendable triron Feb 2023 #80
Huh? Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #81
I know tisis supposed to be sarcasm, but tell me: Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #10
Only took days to arrest 5 policemen in Memphis. Emile Feb 2023 #12
How many ex-presidents of the United States have ever been arrested? Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #16
Trump is not the only subject of issue. PufPuf23 Feb 2023 #27
The poster I replied to made Trump THE subject. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #31
I would start with the GOP members of Congress that requested pardons from Trump PufPuf23 Feb 2023 #36
I am struck by the phrase "crimes that eluded full recognition and punishment" Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #38
How is this for a list? PufPuf23 Feb 2023 #39
Not very impressive at all. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #42
Your work is impressive as is your spin. PufPuf23 Feb 2023 #43
From your initial post (Reply 27): Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #46
Your post is 100% true. gab13by13 Feb 2023 #13
No, my sarcasm does not "presume your significant awareness of all of the above" Silent3 Feb 2023 #21
Your sarcasm did not address the historical context of denying DOJ your benefit of doubt. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #25
Did Nixon go to jail? Dig Agnew go to jail? Silent3 Feb 2023 #32
Let's forget for a moment that Nixon received a presidential pardon and was never a target of DOJ. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #37
A war crime doesn't *have to be* handled by the International Court... Silent3 Feb 2023 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #47
Ok, if you insist. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #50
I totally reject your position on where the burden of proof lies here Silent3 Feb 2023 #74
Misplacing the burden of proof is the theme I see throughout your posts. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #76
Great court decisions like granting the presidency to Bush over Gore? Silent3 Feb 2023 #78
Let me repeat something you must have missed completely: Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #79
I didn't miss anything, I just didn't care Silent3 Feb 2023 #82
Well, color me shocked! Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #83
What can a list of court decisions prove about cases that don't even end up in court? Silent3 Feb 2023 #84
Seriously, what do the non-cases that don't end up in court prove about justice? Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #85
Don't you get the all the anxiety about Trump being brought to justice... Silent3 Feb 2023 #86
I get all the anxiety allright! Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #88
"What I don't get is the insistence that anxiety drives justice." Silent3 Feb 2023 #89
When yo fail to define justice in any meaningful way, and then claim anxiety over something Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #90
What kind of "meaningful way" are you looking for? Silent3 Feb 2023 #91
Talking about justice without defining what it means to you is pretty ridiculous on its face. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #92
Unless it needs to be a deeply technical discussion (hint: no it doesn't)... Silent3 Feb 2023 #93
There IS a common meaning of the idea of justice Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #94
"FOLLOWING THE RULE OF LAW WITHOUT FEAR OR FAVOR." Silent3 Feb 2023 #95
I see, you are now willing to go along with the universally accepted definition for the rule of law, Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #96
So, whatever the DoJ has decided to prosecute (or not) in the past... Silent3 Feb 2023 #97
Bingo! You are slowly getting there. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #98
So, Al Capone's involvement with the St. Valentine's Day Massacre is a "non-event"... Silent3 Feb 2023 #99
I can't believe it, you're right again! Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #100
So, if getting Al Capone on taxes didn't work out.... Silent3 Feb 2023 #101
I thought we covered this before. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #102
Yes, we covered this before, and you've now made the same ridiculous interpretation Silent3 Feb 2023 #103
All that is indeed evidence iemanja Feb 2023 #58
I agree. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #62
Give a gold star to Garland iemanja Feb 2023 #64
Ask Stewart Rhodes and Enrique Tarrio Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #67
The evidence for prosecuting Trump would be clear. iemanja Feb 2023 #57
The evidence is but the prerequisite for an indictment. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #61
But you yourself have shown that precedents do matter iemanja Feb 2023 #63
Context matters. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #65
None of the critics care about Garland's "performance or expertise" iemanja Feb 2023 #66
That's the problem, isn't it? Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #69
Since when is it a citizen's job to praise administration officials? iemanja Feb 2023 #70
Since when is it a citizen's job to bash administration officials? Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #71
Criticism is not bashing. It's democracy iemanja Feb 2023 #72
Unfounded criticism that doesn't end is bashing. It's not democracy. And it's repugnant. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #73
Yeah, we don't want to rush this. Lancero Feb 2023 #15
why would he specifically treestar Feb 2023 #9
OMG, that is the #1 consideration for an institutionalist. gab13by13 Feb 2023 #14
I don't see that E Jean Carroll's suit has anything to do with it treestar Feb 2023 #24
Yawn... brooklynite Feb 2023 #17
Something's got to give. Keep this monstrous POS from running in 2024! Initech Feb 2023 #26
there are grand juries gathering evidence, taking depositions, questioning witnesses bigtree Feb 2023 #28
It would make his job much easier for sure and also boost the, "It's time to move on for the good jalan48 Feb 2023 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author traitorsgalore Feb 2023 #34
it's normally a disparaging term used to slur men or boys thought to have characteristics of women bigtree Feb 2023 #40
It's not a good strategy Mad_Machine76 Feb 2023 #35
He's not. brooklynite Feb 2023 #41
Hope is not a viable strategy. NT Patton French Feb 2023 #45
We can't hope away this problem. Initech Feb 2023 #48
Don't give him any ideas. He needs to be prosecuted and convicted. LiberalFighter Feb 2023 #49
OMG.. that is fucking all. Cha Feb 2023 #51
It's a helluva thread, isn't it? Hekate Feb 2023 #53
lol. there are some rational Cha Feb 2023 #54
See my post re smiting moneychangers in the Temple of Law Hekate Feb 2023 #56
Wow we are really reaching to the bottom of the barrel Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #75
Lady justice with her scales and sword is blindfolded. Prairie_Seagull Feb 2023 #77
I don't take issue with the sentiment of your post at all. I agree with it. However, Sky Jewels Feb 2023 #87
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I gotta wonder if Garland...»Reply #17