Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

napoleon_in_rags

(3,992 posts)
6. He's kicking ass. Check out this Wired article.
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 03:34 PM
Jan 2012
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/01/white-house-blasts-internet-blacklisting-bills/

“Proposed laws must not tamper with the technical architecture of the Internet through manipulation of the Domain Name System (DNS), a foundation of Internet security,” the administration said in a statement. “Our analysis of the DNS filtering provisions in some proposed legislation suggests that they pose a real risk to cybersecurity and yet leave contraband goods and services accessible online. We must avoid legislation that drives users to dangerous, unreliable DNS servers and puts next-generation security policies, such as the deployment of DNSSEC, at risk.”


This shows the President is 100% on top of, and aware of the game. The SOPA legislation would drive people into using unofficial black market DNS servers, which could be used to execute man in the middle attacks on other sites. (for instance, DU would resolve to a different server than DU is actually on, which acts as a proxy to the main site which sniffs passwords, and alters content in transit. But you'd never see it, all you'd know is that DNS lets you access pirate bay)

There are way, way better ways to provide content protection than redirecting kids who like free mp3s onto shadowy spying DNS servers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It just keeps going up. lamp_shade Jan 2012 #1
I'm liking the trend. AtomicKitten Jan 2012 #2
the re-nominate % was even more startling. 91% liberal Dems. 76% moderates. nt dmallind Jan 2012 #3
I'm surprised, I'd thought just the reverse. demosincebirth Jan 2012 #4
You'd think so around here sure - but Obama nationally dmallind Jan 2012 #9
It makes perfect sense Mojorabbit Jan 2012 #11
So why are Dems less likely to do the same the less liberal they are? dmallind Jan 2012 #12
It's a perception issue.... vi5 Jan 2012 #14
Yeah gratuitous Jan 2012 #13
Ah, yes, another attempt to define away the liberals who approve of Obama. TheWraith Jan 2012 #19
Sorry I failed your purity test gratuitous Jan 2012 #20
The only way to define someone in a poll is for them to self-identify. joshcryer Jan 2012 #23
Sounds like the old communist vote totals Vinnie From Indy Jan 2012 #5
He's kicking ass. Check out this Wired article. napoleon_in_rags Jan 2012 #6
If this poll is believed to be true, why are some trashing "purists" with such vigor? AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #7
Because these liberals are largely not delivering a strict ultimatum like a purist would. LoZoccolo Jan 2012 #8
Exactly... vi5 Jan 2012 #10
But people who want to divide others need to create an enemy in the ranks. ClassWarrior Jan 2012 #15
There used to be many people who said that the base was leaving. LoZoccolo Jan 2012 #17
Many? ClassWarrior Jan 2012 #22
If you didn't see any, I guess there weren't that many. LoZoccolo Jan 2012 #24
Perhaps the distinction is between the "activists" and the rank-n-file. This site is littered with Tarheel_Dem Jan 2012 #26
The poll numbers are nonsense. The word "purists" was originated by others, the critics by those AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #27
Last time I checked 86% was a whopping majority. Self appointed "activists" need to understand that Tarheel_Dem Jan 2012 #28
Then you have nothing to worry about. AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #30
! Tarheel_Dem Jan 2012 #31
Self-appointed activists? What does that make you? ClassWarrior Jan 2012 #32
I'm willing to bet dollars to donuts that you know a lot more about Koch than I do. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2012 #33
I'm willing to bet dollars to donuts that I know a lot more than you do... ClassWarrior Jan 2012 #34
Agreed. But not for the reason you think. Tarheel_Dem Jan 2012 #36
So it has nothing to do with vague, incoherent posts like that? ClassWarrior Jan 2012 #37
The hell you say. Well, color me surprised! That's a good sign. Now, on to the moderates and Honeycombe8 Jan 2012 #16
No moral compass kick. Scurrilous Jan 2012 #18
Ha!! Number23 Jan 2012 #21
K & R Tarheel_Dem Jan 2012 #25
NO IT'S NOT!!! uponit7771 Jan 2012 #29
Fuck Ron Paul TransitJohn Jan 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama's Gallup ...»Reply #6