Indoctrination is/is not... [View all]

[keithbvadu2]

Indoctrination is/is not...

I saw an expression about indoctrination but can't find it. I think it was in these forums.

Something like: Indoctrination is not exposing students/people to various ideas that you may not agree with.
Indoctrination is forcibly limiting the exposure to only the ideas you want the students/people to hear.
--------------------------
A much-debated question is whether and how education differs from indoctrination. Many theorists have assumed that the two are distinct and that indoctrination is undesirable, but others have argued that there is no difference in principle and that indoctrination is not intrinsically bad. Theories of indoctrination generally define it in terms of aim, method, or doctrine. Thus, indoctrination is either:
(1) any form of teaching aimed at getting students to adopt beliefs independent of the evidential support those beliefs may have (or lack);
(2) any form of teaching based on methods that instill beliefs in students in such a way that they are unwilling or unable to question or evaluate those beliefs independently; or
(3) any form of teaching that causes students to embrace a specific set of beliefs—e.g., a certain political ideology or a religious doctrine—without regard for its evidential status.

These ways of characterizing indoctrination emphasize its alleged contrast with critical thinking: the critical thinker (according to standard accounts) strives to base his beliefs, judgments, and actions on the competent assessment of relevant reasons and evidence, which is something the victim of indoctrination tends not to do.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/philosophy-of-education/Critical-thinking