Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Initech

(108,815 posts)

37. Elections do not work that way! Good night!

Reply to Hotler (Original post)

Sat Feb 18, 2023, 06:20 PM

Feb 2023

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court Reconsiders Case to Reinstate Trump [View all] Hotler Feb 2023 OP

There is NO EVIDENCE. no_hypocrisy Feb 2023 #1

How it got this far ... friends in high places on the courts Model35mech Feb 2023 #7

That Is Exactly What The Situation Is WiVoter Feb 2023 #13

I still don't get it. no_hypocrisy Feb 2023 #14

As we have seen to much, rules be damned, conservative Judges proceed to do what they can Model35mech Feb 2023 #27

There needs to be consequences for judges that fail to perform. LiberalFighter Feb 2023 #33

Not so in this case. onenote Feb 2023 #20

Good info. Liberal In Texas Feb 2023 #24

See #7. It's entirely procedural, and once the last procedure is complete, Ocelot II Feb 2023 #22

TY.. it's just scary shit even Cha Feb 2023 #29

The headline, from the increasingly RW rag Newsweek, once a respectable publication Ocelot II Feb 2023 #30

Thanks.. as I read more of this Cha Feb 2023 #32

I have mixed feelings about this EYESORE 9001 Feb 2023 #2

Me too NT Tickle Feb 2023 #12

THat headline is misleading. They have NOT decided to take the case yet. hlthe2b Feb 2023 #3

It seems Newsweek is not what it once was. Joinfortmill Feb 2023 #6

That has been the case for years. I and others have exposed it here as a RW zombie rag, and Celerity Feb 2023 #10

Yup, and this the SC has already rejected this story that newsweek is pushing JohnSJ Feb 2023 #17

THIS n/t malaise Feb 2023 #28

More than that - they've already rejected it out of hand FBaggins Feb 2023 #18

+1 hlthe2b Feb 2023 #19

This case is to establish extra-legal, extra-Consitutional pathways to its goal bucolic_frolic Feb 2023 #4

This exactly. We should be able to recognize by now that the corrupt Scrivener7 Feb 2023 #8

See post #7. Ocelot II Feb 2023 #23

They already decided not to hear it. And they will deny the petition for rehearing onenote Feb 2023 #26

Ridiculous. They haven't acknowledged the legitimacy of anything. onenote Feb 2023 #25

It's just procedural Buckeyeblue Feb 2023 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author Celerity Feb 2023 #9

Is it too late to stop the steal of 2000? czarjak Feb 2023 #11

This is bullshit pushed by social media. Shame on Newsweek for pushing this garbage. JohnSJ Feb 2023 #15

The U.S. Supreme Court is not currently considering Brunson's case; the Court denied his petition JohnSJ Feb 2023 #16

What they are "considering" is a petition for rehearing of the Jan. 9 cert denial. It will be denied onenote Feb 2023 #21

I know this will get dismissed, but what if 5 decided to go rogue and do it? Polybius Feb 2023 #31

What would happen if the president "went rogue" and launched nukes? FBaggins Feb 2023 #34

What if pigs with diarrhea started flying? onenote Feb 2023 #35

Traitorous cur on the SCOTUS ZonkerHarris Feb 2023 #36

Elections do not work that way! Good night! Initech Feb 2023 #37

This should not even be on the docket. Baitball Blogger Feb 2023 #38

Being on the docket means next to nothing. onenote Feb 2023 #43

They better not hear this crap Marthe48 Feb 2023 #39

I'm so tired of the damned conspiracy theorist lunatics. Initech Feb 2023 #40

This was yesterday...nothings going to happen brooklynite Feb 2023 #41

This would be a waste of time GoldandSilver Feb 2023 #42