Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Alec Baldwin 'Rust' prosecutors concede embarrassing early loss [View all]
The idiot DA charged Alec Baldwin under a law that was not in existence at the time of the offense. Alec Baldwin's attorneys called this out and the DA was forced to drop this enhancement
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/alec-baldwin-rust-gun-enhancement-rcna71545
As I explained last week, Baldwins attorneys challenged the gun-charge enhancement that New Mexico prosecutors initially tagged on the actor in the 2021 shooting death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins. (Baldwin has denied any wrongdoing.) The enhancement carries a five-year mandatory penalty, instead of the 18 months he could otherwise face if convicted of involuntary manslaughter. The problem with that enhancement, however, is that it didnt become law until after the alleged crime. Thats a big no-no, Constitution-wise, as Baldwins attorneys pointed out......
But the DAs explanation for why the office agreed to downgrade the charge is even more shocking than the legal flop itself. According to spokesperson Heather Brewer:
At least a couple of things are wrong with this statement.
For starters, its difficult to believe that the prosecutor is dropping the most serious potential punishment to avoid litigious distractions, whatever that even means. It should go without saying, but a prosecutors decisions need to be based on the evidence; if a prosecutor is distracted by legal arguments, then theyre in the wrong line of work. And Baldwins argument was clearly more than a distraction, because it caused the most significant possible prison time against him to disappear at the outset of the case.....
Instead, it looks like theres something more straightforward at play: The prosecution was sloppy in charging, Baldwins lawyers raised a clear constitutional issue and the prosecution rightly folded. Now, prosecutors are licking their wounds and lashing out about their misstep with a statement that doesnt reflect well on the DAs office or the future of a case that looked shaky from the start.
But the DAs explanation for why the office agreed to downgrade the charge is even more shocking than the legal flop itself. According to spokesperson Heather Brewer:
In order to avoid further litigious distractions by Mr. Baldwin and his attorneys, the District Attorney and the special prosecutor have removed the firearm enhancement to the involuntary manslaughter charges in the death of Halyna Hutchins on the Rust film set. The prosecutions priority is securing justice, not securing billable hours for big-city attorneys.
At least a couple of things are wrong with this statement.
For starters, its difficult to believe that the prosecutor is dropping the most serious potential punishment to avoid litigious distractions, whatever that even means. It should go without saying, but a prosecutors decisions need to be based on the evidence; if a prosecutor is distracted by legal arguments, then theyre in the wrong line of work. And Baldwins argument was clearly more than a distraction, because it caused the most significant possible prison time against him to disappear at the outset of the case.....
Instead, it looks like theres something more straightforward at play: The prosecution was sloppy in charging, Baldwins lawyers raised a clear constitutional issue and the prosecution rightly folded. Now, prosecutors are licking their wounds and lashing out about their misstep with a statement that doesnt reflect well on the DAs office or the future of a case that looked shaky from the start.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alec Baldwin 'Rust' prosecutors concede embarrassing early loss [View all]
LetMyPeopleVote
Feb 2023
OP
I'm not sure how the DA comes into play, but there is a (Republican) special prosecutor in charge.
W_HAMILTON
Feb 2023
#35
I am still laughing at all of the threads you deleted when you lose the argument
LetMyPeopleVote
Feb 2023
#10
You deleted the threads because your claims were all disproved and you lost the argument
LetMyPeopleVote
Feb 2023
#15
He's a Professor at St Andrews University in Scotland, arguably the most prestigious in the UK.
Emrys
Feb 2023
#26
Just a small aside. St Andrews is the 2nd best uni in Scotland, after U. of Edinburgh, and it also
Celerity
Feb 2023
#29
Without wishing to get sidetracked from the main point of this discussion, I did say "arguably".
Emrys
Feb 2023
#30
I disagree to a point, having either graduated from myself or having had close family
Celerity
Feb 2023
#36
I'm not invested to a preternatural degree, merely stating my opinion & adding in some explanatory
Celerity
Feb 2023
#39
The DA has no case to actually try. This is throwing pasta at the wall to see what sticks.
Ford_Prefect
Feb 2023
#21
The prosecution's priority is securing justice, not securing billable hours for big-city attorneys
AZLD4Candidate
Feb 2023
#24