Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rlegro

(342 posts)
34. I once was summoned to jury duty....
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 09:15 AM
Feb 2023

During voir dire, the defense attorneys asked me in open court about my profession and I said I was a journalist. Boom! The process was halted while the attorneys and a bailiff accompanied me into the federal judge's private chambers, along with a court reporter and her steno machine. The judge, formerly the state's Republican attorney general, grilled me for 5 or 10 minutes about my impartiality. Yup, I had covered trials as a newsman. Yes, I had personal opinions. But as a journalist I said I was trained to be fair-minded and, while I knew the name of a defendant in the case (a public figure), I could listen to the case and make a fair decision. No, I couldn't, because I was struck from the jury. I had been struck in numerous other court proceedings but never with the active participation of the presiding judge at any level. Oh, yes, those in the innermost legal and political systems believe educated and informed people largely are inscrutable jury prospects. They want jurists who are not so much peers as peered at.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Who are you talking about? n/t thesquanderer Feb 2023 #1
Whom am I talking about?? PCIntern Feb 2023 #4
Or you could've just answered the question as easily as typing that response. oldsoftie Feb 2023 #6
I've no idea what he's on about either. BlackSkimmer Feb 2023 #27
Google is your friend Jack the Greater Feb 2023 #77
I wasnt the one asking. And why would it be so hard to just answer the damn question oldsoftie Feb 2023 #82
About whom am I talking Fullduplexxx Feb 2023 #8
If there are 88 threads about this already, why didn't you just post your comment in one of those? thesquanderer Feb 2023 #12
And a good day to you too.... PCIntern Feb 2023 #40
Actually BWdem4life Feb 2023 #64
How many threads have the word "foreperson" in the title PCIntern Feb 2023 #65
I just told you. 18 out of 270 were about the foreperson BWdem4life Feb 2023 #84
I'm lost too Victor_c3 Feb 2023 #14
No idea. BlackSkimmer Feb 2023 #30
Right? All talking about it, no links, no details. You ask and get AllyCat Feb 2023 #41
I kept seeing a name Sympthsical Feb 2023 #52
Here is what is being referred too Beachnutt Feb 2023 #37
Thanks! n/t Victor_c3 Feb 2023 #46
I get a feeling of foreboding watching her. gordianot Feb 2023 #2
Hard to imagine the trauma of listening to many many tapes of the Orange Menace ... Marcus IM Feb 2023 #5
This does seem late. gordianot Feb 2023 #11
Pretty sure those who have followed this closely ... Marcus IM Feb 2023 #13
What's been disclosed publicly in a bunch of Trump scandals is probably the tip of the iceberg. paleotn Feb 2023 #7
Also possibly not comfortable being on camera, it could be nervousness. nt Pobeka Feb 2023 #45
She is excited to have learned so much from her jury experience and be on the inside wishstar Feb 2023 #3
+1 betsuni Feb 2023 #69
I don't understand the negativity towards her. madaboutharry Feb 2023 #9
Maybe that's the key takeaway? calimary Feb 2023 #18
so this individual has now engaged in multiple interviews? stopdiggin Feb 2023 #35
so true! agingdem Feb 2023 #10
Why don't they like educated people on a jury? Buckeyeblue Feb 2023 #15
It depends on whether you're with the prosecution or the defense dlk Feb 2023 #23
Depends on the crime, the defendant, and wnylib Feb 2023 #24
"Jury of their peers" as it should be.. agingdem Feb 2023 #29
ah. the old, 'only the REAL people" have common sense rag stopdiggin Feb 2023 #38
That's ridiculous... agingdem Feb 2023 #42
I agree with you I am not college educated Tree Lady Feb 2023 #66
and as an intelligent individual stopdiggin Feb 2023 #67
You do inthewind21 Feb 2023 #57
there was a bit of sarcasm embedded there stopdiggin Feb 2023 #68
I'm not saying you need to be educated to be on a jury. Buckeyeblue Feb 2023 #43
They consider education and experince X factors localroger Feb 2023 #31
They do inthewind21 Feb 2023 #56
Because "educated" people aren't as easily swayed by emotional arguments... Caliman73 Feb 2023 #58
I once was summoned to jury duty.... rlegro Feb 2023 #34
I call inthewind21 Feb 2023 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author rlegro Feb 2023 #85
When I watched the interview.. quickesst Feb 2023 #16
All of the legal minds True Dough Feb 2023 #17
Rarely.. quickesst Feb 2023 #21
I saw it more as the wonderment of someone Deminpenn Feb 2023 #25
+1 betsuni Feb 2023 #70
I respect that you have an opinion.. quickesst Feb 2023 #79
I saw a clip & thought the same thing. "Why is she smiling so much?" oldsoftie Feb 2023 #39
I've heard more than one prosecutor.. quickesst Feb 2023 #80
I think its a terrible thing for this case. I hope I'm wrong oldsoftie Feb 2023 #81
I hope you're right.. quickesst Feb 2023 #83
Why was she even allowed to speak on camera? TheRickles Feb 2023 #19
Subpoena bpj62 Feb 2023 #20
Thanks! I did not know that. TheRickles Feb 2023 #32
I found it very distressing to see her gush mnhtnbb Feb 2023 #22
I get it and why not...this is her once in a lifetime lollapalooza.. agingdem Feb 2023 #36
She came into this without any notion that people might WANT to spit Hortensis Feb 2023 #54
I am wondering who all prepped her for the interviews. PufPuf23 Feb 2023 #71
:) Me too! And all possible. I don't talk politics Hortensis Feb 2023 #72
It was inspring me... 2naSalit Feb 2023 #48
I'm with you. I thought she was Godawful. Paladin Feb 2023 #74
Yeah... 2naSalit Feb 2023 #75
And she's never voted? I have no idea what to think ecstatic Feb 2023 #73
As BIG as the '20 election was, 1/3 of eligible voters still didnt vote oldsoftie Feb 2023 #87
My main hope is that her interview did not damage the prosecutions' case. panader0 Feb 2023 #26
If the defense thinks she may have prejudiced the jury Danascot Feb 2023 #49
Thank You For That !!! GGoss Feb 2023 #28
...K&R... spanone Feb 2023 #33
Why did she do the interviews in the first place? Did she give a reason? jalan48 Feb 2023 #44
As stated inthewind21 Feb 2023 #61
Thanks-I didn't see anyone interviewing her explain how they got her name and tracked her down. jalan48 Feb 2023 #63
People hate to be reminded that no one is coming to save them. WhiskeyGrinder Feb 2023 #47
She's gonna blab, it's just a matter of time. TheBlackAdder Feb 2023 #50
I saw someone quite different from what you describe delisen Feb 2023 #51
I did not say that she was not intelligent... PCIntern Feb 2023 #55
I agree the whole thing is a joke GusBob Feb 2023 #53
She's young and excited. How many of us have got to serve on a jury involving a corrupt Autumn Feb 2023 #59
She was great. Renew Deal Feb 2023 #62
She was positively giddy talking about Lindsey and Rudy Kennah Feb 2023 #76
Well, that puts a different spin on the chatty little woman's interview, & I rather like it. Hekate Feb 2023 #78
Disagree Meowmee Feb 2023 #86
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The jury foreperson: thi...»Reply #34