Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What was MSNBC thinking? [View all] imanamerican63 Feb 2023 OP
She gave interviews to several outlets, not just MSNBC. LonePirate Feb 2023 #1
That more ammunition for the defense? imanamerican63 Feb 2023 #3
I agree! Rebl2 Feb 2023 #13
Agree! Plus "whataboutism" :) Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #78
CNN, AJC, NYT, and several other media interviewed her as well. hlthe2b Feb 2023 #2
See #3 imanamerican63 Feb 2023 #4
Expert I heard today said no big deal edisdead Feb 2023 #54
View ship means money, and money is the bottom line. republianmushroom Feb 2023 #5
Yes. For profit enterprises! That simple. Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #81
I think it was irresponsible for ANY media to air the interview from that dim wit. Meadowoak Feb 2023 #6
Yeah, and she was the foreman. Makes you wonder... brush Feb 2023 #12
She was the FOREPERSON. niyad Feb 2023 #25
You're right. I knew I should've changed that. brush Feb 2023 #28
Lol Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #38
being foreperson NJCher Feb 2023 #53
What she revealed is promising but such a loose tongue. brush Feb 2023 #68
yes NJCher Feb 2023 #69
Do you find it common for a foreperson to speak Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #75
I do not support this woman in any way NJCher Feb 2023 #77
Interesting, thanks. Strikes me as someone who loves the limelight. Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #80
Possibly NJCher Feb 2023 #82
So you think ok or not. Maybe read too fast but sounds Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #84
Its not the job of a media outlet to ensure a conviction... brooklynite Feb 2023 #49
Why would it compromise anything? betsuni Feb 2023 #7
Stranger things have happened in the past, but I hope don't! imanamerican63 Feb 2023 #8
How would it compromise anything? betsuni Feb 2023 #14
To a national audience, she expressed her opinion as to the LuckyCharms Feb 2023 #20
Rudy has ZERO credibility nationwide, except for the MAGA fringe. Justice matters. Feb 2023 #23
And how many jurors in the final trial will be on the MAGA fringe? LuckyCharms Feb 2023 #24
The selection process for criminal trials' Jurors is extremely vetted. Justice matters. Feb 2023 #26
So I'm gathering that even though she may have danced on eggshells LuckyCharms Feb 2023 #29
She followed the Judge recommendations and didn't disclose who 'may' be indicted Justice matters. Feb 2023 #31
That doesn't answer my question. LuckyCharms Feb 2023 #32
Of course I agree she should not have spoken (and she should have been 'warned' of consequences). Justice matters. Feb 2023 #33
there's also NJCher Feb 2023 #58
Giuliani has been nationally famous for at least 30 years - I really don't think the opinion of some Midwestern Democrat Feb 2023 #35
Outside of deliberations, LuckyCharms Feb 2023 #36
What IF he 'flipped' on tfg? Nobody knows what he said. Justice matters. Feb 2023 #63
Sure as hell is a big deal to me! calimary Feb 2023 #61
agree Meowmee Feb 2023 #62
Good question that's not being answered.. Cha Feb 2023 #17
She did nothing wrong, gab13by13 Feb 2023 #9
You're right. Your statement is the first time I've seen the possibility LuckyCharms Feb 2023 #21
But does she weigh the same as a duck? nt MustBeTheBooz Feb 2023 #34
don't you get it, LC? Skittles Feb 2023 #44
+1000. (nt) Paladin Feb 2023 #76
What???? Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #39
If people expect MSNBC to behave any better than FUX or CNN, they have some wildly RockRaven Feb 2023 #10
I'm losing faith in them all! imanamerican63 Feb 2023 #11
She appears to have taken 'instruction' on what she might discuss seriously, elleng Feb 2023 #15
The first interview was with AP malaise Feb 2023 #16
See response #15 in this thread central scrutinizer Feb 2023 #18
I don't think it's a big deal Buckeyeblue Feb 2023 #19
I agree BigmanPigman Feb 2023 #22
If nothing else, when people are indicted their lawyers will use this as a delay. They'll Scrivener7 Feb 2023 #27
Any guilty verdict will be appealed. Justice matters. Feb 2023 #30
even though federal elections NJCher Feb 2023 #59
didn't see it, don't know who NJCher Feb 2023 #64
You are talking about opinions, and everyone is entitled to them. We are here because we Scrivener7 Feb 2023 #72
Agree. All good. Hoping this cluster will settle down? Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #41
I thought of creating a DU Poll last night BigmanPigman Feb 2023 #47
My dear BP, we are fucked Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #56
Yes, I know. BigmanPigman Feb 2023 #57
I know you know :) Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #60
Oh, dear. Mustn't say that. Above, a poster is insisting that if one wants to say "we're fucked" Scrivener7 Feb 2023 #73
This message was self-deleted by its author Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #42
Alternet is quoting CBS: Attorneys moving to quash indictments due to public statements by the allegorical oracle Feb 2023 #37
And there you have it. LuckyCharms Feb 2023 #40
Think we have to be prepared for a total down. trump is evil to the core. Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #43
Oh, I've always thought witness and jury tampering Captain Zero Feb 2023 #74
Prolly be an inconvenient delay and hopefully little more. Wonder if the attys can/will shop for allegorical oracle Feb 2023 #46
"working to quash" brooklynite Feb 2023 #48
"I would think it would completely compromise any witnesses" brooklynite Feb 2023 #45
She did little more than add a spot of daylight to sprout the attorneys' interest. Katyal is on allegorical oracle Feb 2023 #51
saw that NJCher Feb 2023 #66
listened to right of center talk host, Dan Abrams, who was appalled that this wiggs Feb 2023 #50
+1 betsuni Feb 2023 #55
+1. * Love "toddler-esque" nt Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2023 #83
It's not her fault the media sought her out Generic Brad Feb 2023 #52
They and the others were thinking Meowmee Feb 2023 #65
Apparently the grand jury members went to social gatherings at the prosecutor's office. Calista241 Feb 2023 #67
Stuff like this MFM008 Feb 2023 #70
Exactly. When will we tire of doing him favors? (nt) Paladin Feb 2023 #79
It's news, that's the business. betsuni Feb 2023 #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What was MSNBC thinking?»Reply #17