Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: HALF the companies using ChatGPT say it has already replaced workers (Fortune) [View all]progree
(13,089 posts)12. Some top execs, low level supervisors, and everyone in between don't care about quality
or accuracy.
But hey, why should top execs care about accuracy or plagiarism, or hallucinating AI that just makes stuff up, when they can cut payroll?
Once upon a time, I was a new engineer. As a brand new engineer needing something to do, my boss often gave me unimportant projects that nevertheless some kind of response was needed. It was get it done quick, if they (the recipient) complains, well, no problem here.
A chatGPT type of solution that just spewed out something that somewhat fit the request would have been just fine with him/them. Perfect actually.
A person like me and most engineers who take pride in their work and just can't knowingly and deliberately produce crap -- that wasn't a fit at all.
By the way that boss, even though an electrical engineering superintendant at a major electric utility, ended up leaving and working for his father's auto dealership. I had forgotten about him all these past 40 years. Then about 5 years ago I read in the paper that he was responsible for cheating many law enforcement agencies on equipment upgrades to their vehicles -- hundreds of vehicles. It blew me away to see his name (and I verified that yup, that's the same guy for sure). And yes, he pressured employees to do this stuff and one or two of them eventually whistle-blew on him.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
HALF the companies using ChatGPT say it has already replaced workers (Fortune) [View all]
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
OP
What part of "the OpenAI CEO says not to rely on ChatGPT for anything important"
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#3
The poster you just responded to is talking about AI in general, not ChatGPT in particular
Silent3
Feb 2023
#6
Thanks, but I was aware of that, just as I'm aware of tech replacing jobs.
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#7
You posted in this thread to argue, as you have in other threads I've posted about AI.
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#20
Some top execs, low level supervisors, and everyone in between don't care about quality
progree
Feb 2023
#12
It isn't an absurd statement. I have the greatest respect for teachers who
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#54
I think the point is you're focusing on the harm part and not the regulation/education part.
Renew Deal
Feb 2023
#34
When I see articles on workable regulations and other approaches to mitigating the harm AI will
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#40
Now we will blame Biden for job losses as we did blame Clinton's NAFTA when automation took jobs
Samrob
Feb 2023
#39
Our nation was promised these tech. jobs. I am pretty sure it was a way to promise us that the-
Prairie_Seagull
Feb 2023
#41
Precisely, human intervention is still required... In short, it only eliminates busy work
JCMach1
Feb 2023
#51
What a mess! Good copy editors are a treasure, and from what I've heard, usually
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#62
No, it isn't. Writing a story, or writing an article, was never the same thing
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#55
Some CT scans, MRI scans,and (others one would think) are already being read by people overseas
Prairie_Seagull
Feb 2023
#57