Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: HALF the companies using ChatGPT say it has already replaced workers (Fortune) [View all]honest.abe
(9,238 posts)56. How would that work.. "ChatGPT should be banned"?
Who, where and how would that be enforced? Sure you could block access in the school network but many have internet access through their cell phones. It seems a losing battle with technology winning. I think in the classroom situation, writing assignments and test taking should all be in the classroom with no cell phones. You know there is already a huge issue with students buying online help with writing papers and take home assignments long before ChatGPT. Do you not care about that??
This AI chat technology is actually still in its early stages. If you are upset about this now, you will go apeshit in a few more years.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
HALF the companies using ChatGPT say it has already replaced workers (Fortune) [View all]
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
OP
What part of "the OpenAI CEO says not to rely on ChatGPT for anything important"
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#3
The poster you just responded to is talking about AI in general, not ChatGPT in particular
Silent3
Feb 2023
#6
Thanks, but I was aware of that, just as I'm aware of tech replacing jobs.
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#7
You posted in this thread to argue, as you have in other threads I've posted about AI.
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#20
Some top execs, low level supervisors, and everyone in between don't care about quality
progree
Feb 2023
#12
It isn't an absurd statement. I have the greatest respect for teachers who
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#54
I think the point is you're focusing on the harm part and not the regulation/education part.
Renew Deal
Feb 2023
#34
When I see articles on workable regulations and other approaches to mitigating the harm AI will
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#40
Now we will blame Biden for job losses as we did blame Clinton's NAFTA when automation took jobs
Samrob
Feb 2023
#39
Our nation was promised these tech. jobs. I am pretty sure it was a way to promise us that the-
Prairie_Seagull
Feb 2023
#41
Precisely, human intervention is still required... In short, it only eliminates busy work
JCMach1
Feb 2023
#51
What a mess! Good copy editors are a treasure, and from what I've heard, usually
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#62
No, it isn't. Writing a story, or writing an article, was never the same thing
highplainsdem
Feb 2023
#55
Some CT scans, MRI scans,and (others one would think) are already being read by people overseas
Prairie_Seagull
Feb 2023
#57