You left out the du know-it-alls. (Reply #5)

In the discussion thread: This was just reported on MSNBC. [View all]

Response to ificandream (Reply #3)

Wed Mar 1, 2023, 08:11 PM

we can do it (11,873 posts)

5. You left out the du know-it-alls.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

169 replies	Author	Time	Post
This was just reported on MSNBC. [View all]	fightforfreedom	Mar 2023	OP
Recommend!	sheshe2	Mar 2023	#1
One more.	we can do it	Mar 2023	#4
K&R	betsuni	Mar 2023	#2
Thanks for this.	ificandream	Mar 2023	#3
You left out the du know-it-alls.	we can do it	Mar 2023	#5
+1	BaronChocula	Mar 2023	#77
But I have a RIGHT to know everything DOJ knows. Immediately!	brooklynite	Mar 2023	#6
Why wait for the facts and full story, when one can just make assumptions?	Fiendish Thingy	Mar 2023	#46
By whom?	Orrex	Mar 2023	#87
I read that with the sound of tongue in cheek.	WheelWalker	Mar 2023	#96
Perhaps, but that poster lands hard on people who engage in wry hyperbole	Orrex	Mar 2023	#147
Speculation stokes the egos of those who blab. Those who know don't talk. . . . nt	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#107
+10000	bdamomma	Mar 2023	#7
K&R......	Lovie777	Mar 2023	#8
I think the investigation could go on forever unless it is adjudicated in the courts.	kentuck	Mar 2023	#9
All the investigations are moving in that direction, towards indictments and the courts.	fightforfreedom	Mar 2023	#12
Well, a grand jury is the first stop in the court process	Fiendish Thingy	Mar 2023	#48
Yes, grand jury is a "first stop"; it is not a place to homestead and plant crops.	Magoo48	Mar 2023	#122
That is the only way we get any real information is in the filings in the court system	Bev54	Mar 2023	#74
This message was self-deleted by its author	Chin music	Mar 2023	#154
I've never argued that there aren't details unknown to the public	Silent3	Mar 2023	#10
Likewise, if DOJ deserves no benefit of the doubt,	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#39
It's not like I'm going to flip Garland the bird in I run into him on the street	Silent3	Mar 2023	#45
The pessimism you are describing is a sure sign of contempt of doubt.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#62
What does it matter?	Silent3	Mar 2023	#65
Then you are proposing that DOJ deserves contempt based entirely on your feelings.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#79
I'm proposing that my feelings are irrelevant to any important issue being discussed here. n/t	Silent3	Mar 2023	#81
Nobody is hurt if you are silent. But when people continually erode faith in the US government	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#111
Far more prominent and important people than myself have expressed their doubts...	Silent3	Mar 2023	#133
This exactly	edhopper	Mar 2023	#41
Exactly	orthoclad	Mar 2023	#92
time is running out-	Meowmee	Mar 2023	#113
"There is a GAP between what the DOJ has been doing and what the public knows."	Goodheart	Mar 2023	#11
You just proved my point. Thank you.	fightforfreedom	Mar 2023	#14
Because we don't know exactly what the DOJ is doing	News Junkie	Mar 2023	#149
Apparently there is no time limit on waiting.	gab13by13	Mar 2023	#18
there is a gap	azureblue	Mar 2023	#36
There is a gap because Trump used	gab13by13	Mar 2023	#50
Trump got caught	orthoclad	Mar 2023	#93
you are correct	republianmushroom	Mar 2023	#60
Thank you.	PoindexterOglethorpe	Mar 2023	#71
"zero chance of Trump being indicted": because you are an insider and know	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#112
And all those who confidently assert he'll be indicted any day now	PoindexterOglethorpe	Mar 2023	#138
I do not confidently assert he'll be indicted any day now	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#145
Have you been following the Georgia investigation?	fightforfreedom	Mar 2023	#120
That time thing. I've been schooled here a lot about that 25+ months thing.	jaxexpat	Mar 2023	#43
"the coup won already": your only conclusion with that premise is that Biden staged a coup and won	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#110
Not to mention:	DFW	Mar 2023	#114
Back up, Bernardo. You twist meaning and provide illogical critique. Typical strawman "stuff"ing	jaxexpat	Mar 2023	#116
Mean what you write, jax, write what you mean. We can't read minds. Write clearly. . . nt	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#117
All careful, legal, righteous, successful DoJs will be slow by being careful, legal, and successful	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#118
Looks like you are blaming the wrong person	wnylib	Mar 2023	#104
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻	onecaliberal	Mar 2023	#26
Forever	orangecrush	Mar 2023	#29
The answer is, as long as you don't know what DOJ is doing.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#34
I'm not sick over it	orangecrush	Mar 2023	#47
Then why did you write you are?	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#64
If you read closely	orangecrush	Mar 2023	#131
been sick of it for some time. Remember Mueller's investigation.	republianmushroom	Mar 2023	#58
You need to expand your sources beyond TV lawyers	Fiendish Thingy	Mar 2023	#55
agreed	Skittles	Mar 2023	#98
What a bunch of BS: "Garland waited almost 2 years to conduct a serious investigation"	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#109
Just when, exactly, was Jack Smith appointed as Special Counsel?	Goodheart	Mar 2023	#124
Nonsense. You are ignorant of the fact Smith inherited a sprawling ongoing investigation	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#125
That's funny...	Goodheart	Mar 2023	#126
That 6 month old article does not support your assertion	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#132
If the risk wasn't an existential one, I think more people wouldn't be in full panic mode	Mr. Ected	Mar 2023	#13
I agree, I get it.	fightforfreedom	Mar 2023	#17
The government watch dog, the GAO	gab13by13	Mar 2023	#21
An existential risk is not an excuse for DOJ to circumvent the rule of law.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#31
Didn't say it was	Mr. Ected	Mar 2023	#40
Likewise, the anxiety of citizens is misdirected when addressed to DOJ.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#59
Saw him	malaise	Mar 2023	#15
How long should it take to indict for a crime committed in public?	Ptah	Mar 2023	#16
Try to indict without evidence of intent to commit a crime	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#30
He admitted to obstruction of justice on the TV machine.	Ptah	Mar 2023	#37
No intent to obstruct justice, though.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#53
Firing the FBI guy to stop an investigation is a crime.	Ptah	Mar 2023	#57
Mueller concluded that it was up to Congress to determine whether	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#75
He said that based on a... MEMO written by a Nixon appointee... not a Law...	Justice matters.	Mar 2023	#140
That's funny	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#144
None of these specify a sitting President cannot be prosecuted for criminal activities	Justice matters.	Mar 2023	#151
Apparently, Mueller disagreed with you.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#155
LOL, no. :)	Justice matters.	Mar 2023	#156
LOL no, Mueller doesn't disagree with you?	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#157
Mueller was a Banana Republican FBI Director.	Justice matters.	Mar 2023	#158
How does this change the US Constitution?	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#159
The banana republican memo should be nullified by Congress for the reasons	Justice matters.	Mar 2023	#160
I must say, I envy your ambition in choosing your adversaries.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#161
This message was self-deleted by its author	Justice matters.	Mar 2023	#162
Don't forger to put the US Constitution on your ignore list too.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#163
Why so nasty on a message board???	Justice matters.	Mar 2023	#164
Why self-delete instead of putting me on ignore, as promised?	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#165
How about "I am free to do what I want when I want to" boy?	Justice matters.	Mar 2023	#166
A perfect answer.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#167
And I am free to put you on my ignore list (for a while)	Justice matters.	Mar 2023	#168
Once again, I am thrilled with the prospect of getting on your ignore list.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#169
You can subscribe to the DOJ news feed.	AndyS	Mar 2023	#19
+1	chowder66	Mar 2023	#24
The other sode of the story is tick, tick, tick	lame54	Mar 2023	#20
That IS a big factor.	BigmanPigman	Mar 2023	#95
The big "GAP" today,	Ponietz	Mar 2023	#22
It's not just a matter of drawing conclusions.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#23
"AlL iS wELL!11"	BannonsLiver	Mar 2023	#25
This message was self-deleted by its author	CrispyQ	Mar 2023	#27
Meanwhile, Grassley wants Garland to explain why Hunter Biden hasn't been arrested.	Frasier Balzov	Mar 2023	#28
The DOJ should have started their investigation into 1/6 ...	aggiesal	Mar 2023	#32
They started before Garland was sworn in.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#49
So we knew on Jan. 15, 2021 that DOJ was arresting and charging unwashed Magats,	gab13by13	Mar 2023	#52
I don't see how this relates to my reply.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#68
That article only mentioned this about the DOJ ...	aggiesal	Mar 2023	#54
I quoted the pertinent part of the artocle, and gave a link to it	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#67
They went after the Worker Bees, not Trump or his Minions ...	aggiesal	Mar 2023	#90
So they DID start their investigations on 1/7, 2021, didn't they?	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#94
Don't parse words. ...	aggiesal	Mar 2023	#102
Please pay attention to the thread	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#123
I think you have to stay on subject ...	aggiesal	Mar 2023	#134
Never asserted any such thing.	Beastly Boy	Mar 2023	#135
Absolutely	relayerbob	Mar 2023	#33
Unless your name is Hillary. nt	wiggs	Mar 2023	#35
for sure	azureblue	Mar 2023	#38
Wait, so Garland isn't destroying our institutions?	Fiendish Thingy	Mar 2023	#42
Why did Garland refuse to investigate	gab13by13	Mar 2023	#63
Please post a link to Garland's statement declining to investigate J6 intelligence failures.	Fiendish Thingy	Mar 2023	#72
I already did this morning	gab13by13	Mar 2023	#78
Must have been deleted.	Fiendish Thingy	Mar 2023	#83
Really self-centered of you to think everyone is in YOUR time zone	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#136
There is only one post in this thread with an :01 time stamp this morning	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#137
"intelligence failures" don't constitute crimes.	brooklynite	Mar 2023	#76
I'm with you.	triron	Mar 2023	#84
LOL	treestar	Mar 2023	#143
If any institution in America reflected its demographics	cachukis	Mar 2023	#44
Repeat until it sinks in. Thank you.	Joinfortmill	Mar 2023	#51
Recommended.	H2O Man	Mar 2023	#56
Part of the impatience comes from Fitzmas and Muller time. Or Eric Holder -lets move forward.	3Hotdogs	Mar 2023	#61
We know our justice system is far from perfect and we know it's not geared to investigate	yaesu	Mar 2023	#66
What would you expect a top DoJ official to say.	republianmushroom	Mar 2023	#69
But there are SOME things we do know.	pnwmom	Mar 2023	#70
We get it. We just don't want a repeat in Jan 2025. mccarthy has given out the blueprint.	ecstatic	Mar 2023	#73
TY!	Cha	Mar 2023	#80
Over two years and no one above CHUD level has been indicted.	dchill	Mar 2023	#82
I remember the Bush Administration. Is he still in office?	brooklynite	Mar 2023	#89
No. Both he and Dick are living out their lives...	dchill	Mar 2023	#103
My point is that President Biden has hired a competent person to run DOJ.	brooklynite	Mar 2023	#121
My definition of competent is results-oriented.	dchill	Mar 2023	#139
And you know that enough time has passed for "results"?	brooklynite	Mar 2023	#141
K&R	ismnotwasm	Mar 2023	#85
Ho-hum	Orrex	Mar 2023	#86
It seems to me	markodochartaigh	Mar 2023	#88
TWO YEARS...	orthoclad	Mar 2023	#91
+1	Laura PourMeADrink	Mar 2023	#101
+1	Emile	Mar 2023	#108
+1000.	Nay	Mar 2023	#142
Here's the video for those who missed it:	Rhiannon12866	Mar 2023	#97
KnR	Hekate	Mar 2023	#99
Post removed	Post removed	Mar 2023	#100
What? You are attacking OP's motivations, calling them a paid shill? Is it wrong to support Dems?	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#106
A site that supports a Democrat "no matter what" loses credibility quite fast.	Goodheart	Mar 2023	#127
That does not apply in this thread. Why is the poster calling the OP a paid shill?	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#129
lol	Meowmee	Mar 2023	#115
I don't work for anybody, I'm retired.	fightforfreedom	Mar 2023	#119
25 months?	BWdem4life	Mar 2023	#105
Where's the rush? Mueller, Durham, Smith: paid by the hour.	Goodheart	Mar 2023	#128
You make stuff up again. Stop with the falsities. SCs are salaried positions. . . . nt	Bernardo de La Paz	Mar 2023	#130
Two years ago..... just wait!!!	LiberalLovinLug	Mar 2023	#146
People can bring up the time factor all they want.	fightforfreedom	Mar 2023	#150
"It's over"	LiberalLovinLug	Mar 2023	#152
Doom and Gloom. How do you get through the day?	fightforfreedom	Mar 2023	#153
Imagine if James Comey had followed DOJ rules.	StevieM	Mar 2023	#148

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.