General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This was just reported on MSNBC. [View all]cachukis
(3,617 posts)inclusively we could pass judgement conclusively.
However, science attracts scientists, hospitality is filled with servers to their managers; a disparity by job.
Law enforcers are cut from a cloth that deals with aberrance. By nature, they have to be combat ready.
It is pretty safe to say, they follow orders.
The rub is, rules are for the other guy, for all of us.
Garland is at work correcting this. He is an extention of the intent of the Declaration and Constitution of the people. Great ideas, but not easy to apply.
Justice is sorta blind. We all want to be forgiven our transgressions.
It's okay if Biden slides on a Bernie passion, even though we know it's not right.
This FBI conundrum is now on full display.
Trump should be in jail. But the FBI is not Garland. It is law enforcement by loyalty. It always has been.
There are those who are the inclusive, but there are those of the exclusive. Appointments matter.
I worry that Garland has too much to fix.
I worry that half the country is opposed to inclusivity.
I worry that most of the country has no idea of what I write.
Our commonality is wispy. Most here are on similar pages, but how many onion peelers are there left out there.
Philosophers were once our guide. Garland is applying the principles of high level thinking. Time is not on his side.