General Discussion

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)

135. Never asserted any such thing.

Thu Mar 2, 2023, 10:18 AM

Mar 2023

Last edited Thu Mar 2, 2023, 12:39 PM - Edit history (1)

"Your assertion that arresting the worker bees is equivalent to starting an investigation into how & why 1/6 occurred does not equate to investigating into what Pendejo45 & his minions did that actually caused 1/6 insurrection to occur" That's just false on its face.

What I asserted was that the investigation started on 1/7, 2021, as per sources I cited. Deal with it.

I will not be dragged into the bullshit bickering over worker bees, small fish, low hanging fruit, etc., for three reasons: first, it doesn't affect the starting date of the investigation; second, going after trump and his minions does not in any way signify the beginning of the investigation, and third, tying trump to the beginning of the investigation is a red herring.to begin with.

Still not biting.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

169 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This was just reported on MSNBC. [View all] fightforfreedom Mar 2023 OP

Recommend! sheshe2 Mar 2023 #1

One more. we can do it Mar 2023 #4

K&R betsuni Mar 2023 #2

Thanks for this. ificandream Mar 2023 #3

You left out the du know-it-alls. we can do it Mar 2023 #5

+1 BaronChocula Mar 2023 #77

But I have a RIGHT to know everything DOJ knows. Immediately! brooklynite Mar 2023 #6

Why wait for the facts and full story, when one can just make assumptions? Fiendish Thingy Mar 2023 #46

By whom? Orrex Mar 2023 #87

I read that with the sound of tongue in cheek. WheelWalker Mar 2023 #96

Perhaps, but that poster lands hard on people who engage in wry hyperbole Orrex Mar 2023 #147

Speculation stokes the egos of those who blab. Those who know don't talk. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #107

+10000 bdamomma Mar 2023 #7

K&R...... Lovie777 Mar 2023 #8

I think the investigation could go on forever unless it is adjudicated in the courts. kentuck Mar 2023 #9

All the investigations are moving in that direction, towards indictments and the courts. fightforfreedom Mar 2023 #12

Well, a grand jury is the first stop in the court process Fiendish Thingy Mar 2023 #48

Yes, grand jury is a "first stop"; it is not a place to homestead and plant crops. Magoo48 Mar 2023 #122

That is the only way we get any real information is in the filings in the court system Bev54 Mar 2023 #74

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2023 #154

I've never argued that there aren't details unknown to the public Silent3 Mar 2023 #10

Likewise, if DOJ deserves no benefit of the doubt, Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #39

It's not like I'm going to flip Garland the bird in I run into him on the street Silent3 Mar 2023 #45

The pessimism you are describing is a sure sign of contempt of doubt. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #62

What does it matter? Silent3 Mar 2023 #65

Then you are proposing that DOJ deserves contempt based entirely on your feelings. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #79

I'm proposing that my feelings are irrelevant to any important issue being discussed here. n/t Silent3 Mar 2023 #81

Nobody is hurt if you are silent. But when people continually erode faith in the US government Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #111

Far more prominent and important people than myself have expressed their doubts... Silent3 Mar 2023 #133

This exactly edhopper Mar 2023 #41

Exactly orthoclad Mar 2023 #92

time is running out- Meowmee Mar 2023 #113

"There is a GAP between what the DOJ has been doing and what the public knows." Goodheart Mar 2023 #11

You just proved my point. Thank you. fightforfreedom Mar 2023 #14

Because we don't know exactly what the DOJ is doing News Junkie Mar 2023 #149

Apparently there is no time limit on waiting. gab13by13 Mar 2023 #18

there is a gap azureblue Mar 2023 #36

There is a gap because Trump used gab13by13 Mar 2023 #50

Trump got caught orthoclad Mar 2023 #93

you are correct republianmushroom Mar 2023 #60

Thank you. PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2023 #71

"zero chance of Trump being indicted": because you are an insider and know Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #112

And all those who confidently assert he'll be indicted any day now PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2023 #138

I do not confidently assert he'll be indicted any day now Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #145

Have you been following the Georgia investigation? fightforfreedom Mar 2023 #120

That time thing. I've been schooled here a lot about that 25+ months thing. jaxexpat Mar 2023 #43

"the coup won already": your only conclusion with that premise is that Biden staged a coup and won Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #110

Not to mention: DFW Mar 2023 #114

Back up, Bernardo. You twist meaning and provide illogical critique. Typical strawman "stuff"ing jaxexpat Mar 2023 #116

Mean what you write, jax, write what you mean. We can't read minds. Write clearly. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #117

All careful, legal, righteous, successful DoJs will be slow by being careful, legal, and successful Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #118

Looks like you are blaming the wrong person wnylib Mar 2023 #104

👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 onecaliberal Mar 2023 #26

Forever orangecrush Mar 2023 #29

The answer is, as long as you don't know what DOJ is doing. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #34

I'm not sick over it orangecrush Mar 2023 #47

Then why did you write you are? Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #64

If you read closely orangecrush Mar 2023 #131

been sick of it for some time. Remember Mueller's investigation. republianmushroom Mar 2023 #58

You need to expand your sources beyond TV lawyers Fiendish Thingy Mar 2023 #55

agreed Skittles Mar 2023 #98

What a bunch of BS: "Garland waited almost 2 years to conduct a serious investigation" Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #109

Just when, exactly, was Jack Smith appointed as Special Counsel? Goodheart Mar 2023 #124

Nonsense. You are ignorant of the fact Smith inherited a sprawling ongoing investigation Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #125

That's funny... Goodheart Mar 2023 #126

That 6 month old article does not support your assertion Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #132

If the risk wasn't an existential one, I think more people wouldn't be in full panic mode Mr. Ected Mar 2023 #13

I agree, I get it. fightforfreedom Mar 2023 #17

The government watch dog, the GAO gab13by13 Mar 2023 #21

An existential risk is not an excuse for DOJ to circumvent the rule of law. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #31

Didn't say it was Mr. Ected Mar 2023 #40

Likewise, the anxiety of citizens is misdirected when addressed to DOJ. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #59

Saw him malaise Mar 2023 #15

How long should it take to indict for a crime committed in public? Ptah Mar 2023 #16

Try to indict without evidence of intent to commit a crime Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #30

He admitted to obstruction of justice on the TV machine. Ptah Mar 2023 #37

No intent to obstruct justice, though. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #53

Firing the FBI guy to stop an investigation is a crime. Ptah Mar 2023 #57

Mueller concluded that it was up to Congress to determine whether Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #75

He said that based on a... MEMO written by a Nixon appointee... not a Law... Justice matters. Mar 2023 #140

That's funny Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #144

None of these specify a sitting President cannot be prosecuted for criminal activities Justice matters. Mar 2023 #151

Apparently, Mueller disagreed with you. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #155

LOL, no. :) Justice matters. Mar 2023 #156

LOL no, Mueller doesn't disagree with you? Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #157

Mueller was a Banana Republican FBI Director. Justice matters. Mar 2023 #158

How does this change the US Constitution? Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #159

The banana republican memo should be nullified by Congress for the reasons Justice matters. Mar 2023 #160

I must say, I envy your ambition in choosing your adversaries. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #161

This message was self-deleted by its author Justice matters. Mar 2023 #162

Don't forger to put the US Constitution on your ignore list too. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #163

Why so nasty on a message board??? Justice matters. Mar 2023 #164

Why self-delete instead of putting me on ignore, as promised? Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #165

How about "I am free to do what I want when I want to" boy? Justice matters. Mar 2023 #166

A perfect answer. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #167

And I am free to put you on my ignore list (for a while) Justice matters. Mar 2023 #168

Once again, I am thrilled with the prospect of getting on your ignore list. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #169

You can subscribe to the DOJ news feed. AndyS Mar 2023 #19

+1 chowder66 Mar 2023 #24

The other sode of the story is tick, tick, tick lame54 Mar 2023 #20

That IS a big factor. BigmanPigman Mar 2023 #95

The big "GAP" today, Ponietz Mar 2023 #22

It's not just a matter of drawing conclusions. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #23

"AlL iS wELL!11" BannonsLiver Mar 2023 #25

This message was self-deleted by its author CrispyQ Mar 2023 #27

Meanwhile, Grassley wants Garland to explain why Hunter Biden hasn't been arrested. Frasier Balzov Mar 2023 #28

The DOJ should have started their investigation into 1/6 ... aggiesal Mar 2023 #32

They started before Garland was sworn in. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #49

So we knew on Jan. 15, 2021 that DOJ was arresting and charging unwashed Magats, gab13by13 Mar 2023 #52

I don't see how this relates to my reply. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #68

That article only mentioned this about the DOJ ... aggiesal Mar 2023 #54

I quoted the pertinent part of the artocle, and gave a link to it Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #67

They went after the Worker Bees, not Trump or his Minions ... aggiesal Mar 2023 #90

So they DID start their investigations on 1/7, 2021, didn't they? Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #94

Don't parse words. ... aggiesal Mar 2023 #102

Please pay attention to the thread Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #123

I think you have to stay on subject ... aggiesal Mar 2023 #134

Never asserted any such thing. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #135

Absolutely relayerbob Mar 2023 #33

Unless your name is Hillary. nt wiggs Mar 2023 #35

for sure azureblue Mar 2023 #38

Wait, so Garland isn't destroying our institutions? Fiendish Thingy Mar 2023 #42

Why did Garland refuse to investigate gab13by13 Mar 2023 #63

Please post a link to Garland's statement declining to investigate J6 intelligence failures. Fiendish Thingy Mar 2023 #72

I already did this morning gab13by13 Mar 2023 #78

Must have been deleted. Fiendish Thingy Mar 2023 #83

Really self-centered of you to think everyone is in YOUR time zone Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #136

There is only one post in this thread with an :01 time stamp this morning Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #137

"intelligence failures" don't constitute crimes. brooklynite Mar 2023 #76

I'm with you. triron Mar 2023 #84

LOL treestar Mar 2023 #143

If any institution in America reflected its demographics cachukis Mar 2023 #44

Repeat until it sinks in. Thank you. Joinfortmill Mar 2023 #51

Recommended. H2O Man Mar 2023 #56

Part of the impatience comes from Fitzmas and Muller time. Or Eric Holder -lets move forward. 3Hotdogs Mar 2023 #61

We know our justice system is far from perfect and we know it's not geared to investigate yaesu Mar 2023 #66

What would you expect a top DoJ official to say. republianmushroom Mar 2023 #69

But there are SOME things we do know. pnwmom Mar 2023 #70

We get it. We just don't want a repeat in Jan 2025. mccarthy has given out the blueprint. ecstatic Mar 2023 #73

TY! Cha Mar 2023 #80

Over two years and no one above CHUD level has been indicted. dchill Mar 2023 #82

I remember the Bush Administration. Is he still in office? brooklynite Mar 2023 #89

No. Both he and Dick are living out their lives... dchill Mar 2023 #103

My point is that President Biden has hired a competent person to run DOJ. brooklynite Mar 2023 #121

My definition of competent is results-oriented. dchill Mar 2023 #139

And you know that enough time has passed for "results"? brooklynite Mar 2023 #141

K&R ismnotwasm Mar 2023 #85

Ho-hum Orrex Mar 2023 #86

It seems to me markodochartaigh Mar 2023 #88

TWO YEARS... orthoclad Mar 2023 #91

+1 Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2023 #101

+1 Emile Mar 2023 #108

+1000. Nay Mar 2023 #142

Here's the video for those who missed it: Rhiannon12866 Mar 2023 #97

KnR Hekate Mar 2023 #99

Post removed Post removed Mar 2023 #100

What? You are attacking OP's motivations, calling them a paid shill? Is it wrong to support Dems? Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #106

A site that supports a Democrat "no matter what" loses credibility quite fast. Goodheart Mar 2023 #127

That does not apply in this thread. Why is the poster calling the OP a paid shill? Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #129

lol Meowmee Mar 2023 #115

I don't work for anybody, I'm retired. fightforfreedom Mar 2023 #119

25 months? BWdem4life Mar 2023 #105

Where's the rush? Mueller, Durham, Smith: paid by the hour. Goodheart Mar 2023 #128

You make stuff up again. Stop with the falsities. SCs are salaried positions. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2023 #130

Two years ago..... just wait!!! LiberalLovinLug Mar 2023 #146

People can bring up the time factor all they want. fightforfreedom Mar 2023 #150

"It's over" LiberalLovinLug Mar 2023 #152

Doom and Gloom. How do you get through the day? fightforfreedom Mar 2023 #153

Imagine if James Comey had followed DOJ rules. StevieM Mar 2023 #148