Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,909 posts)
1. No different than using any other tool.
Wed Mar 15, 2023, 02:17 PM
Mar 2023

If you use a knife to kill someone, you - as the person wielding the knife are liable for the killing.

If you use computer software to commit bank fraud, you - as the person devising the scheme which uses the software, are liable for the fraud.

AI is a tool. If you use it to cause harm you will be responsible for the harm (assuming it falls within the elements of a civil claim or criminal charge).

As to copyright infringement, it is relatively untested law. But it is likely that both the entity that provided the training database (reproducing the work in a traininig form) and the person who used the software will be liable (and, in doing so created a derivative work from the original works). Assuming that, once the law is settled, using work for training without licensing it constitutes infringement. (It should, but it's relatively new law.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Philosophical question to...»Reply #1