Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Model35mech

(2,047 posts)
25. Question 4 Tank experts: Is the T-55 Amphibious?
Thu Mar 23, 2023, 04:27 PM
Mar 2023

I am asking because I found this sentence about Israeli captured T-55s (which were designated 'Tiran' by Israel):

"The Tiran was used in the operation “Raviv” on the 8th & 9th of September 1969, which was an amphibious raid across the Suez channel as well as the 1973 Yom Kippur War in the southern front, against Egyptian T-54/55." https://tanknutdave.com/the-russian-t-55-medium-tank/

I know from TV documentaries on tanks that the Russians produced medium amphibious tanks late in WWII, I don't know if they were variants of T54 and T55 which IIRC weren't produced until after WWII ended.

I do know that in the past month there have been reports that Russia has hauled out of mothballs BMPs from the 60's that are lightly armored and amphibious. Just wondering if there is more to Russia's decision than low availability of contemporary heavy battle tanks. Amphibious armor would clearly be useful considering the many rivers needing crossed between Donetsk and Kyiv along the upper Dniper valley






Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Gawd did Putin really screw up underpants Mar 2023 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author underpants Mar 2023 #2
It's actually a brilliant strategy. dawg Mar 2023 #3
Ukraine can sell them to the five or six Third Word nations that are still using them. Aristus Mar 2023 #13
Multiply that by 10 sarisataka Mar 2023 #16
Are these photos more reliable sarisataka Mar 2023 #4
I say again, tank crews? CanonRay Mar 2023 #5
Raw recruits. maxsolomon Mar 2023 #7
You're probably right CanonRay Mar 2023 #8
The T-55 is notoriously difficult to drive, even when in the best condition. Aristus Mar 2023 #14
These tanks are BBQ pits on wheels. Irish_Dem Mar 2023 #17
This unbelievable callousness concerning their own soldiers CanonRay Mar 2023 #21
We shall if the Russian people care or not. Irish_Dem Mar 2023 #23
During WWII, US grabbed random soldiers and made them tankers Kaleva Mar 2023 #26
Bury Your Enemy modrepub Mar 2023 #31
It shows that Rusher has plenty of surplus armaments left. maxsolomon Mar 2023 #6
The main difference Russia during WWII had allies who supplied them gordianot Mar 2023 #9
They supplied their own meat for the grinder. maxsolomon Mar 2023 #15
Yes the Russians threw many bodies at the Germans. Irish_Dem Mar 2023 #19
Yes, and approximately 2/3rds of the entire German army and airforce Disaffected Mar 2023 #22
Yes US and UK supplied support to the Russians during WWII. Irish_Dem Mar 2023 #18
Yep might as well use the stuff in mothballs. Irish_Dem Mar 2023 #20
Russia is reportedly running low on artillery shells too Kaleva Mar 2023 #27
If only we were supplying Ukraine with A-10 Warthogs... GoCubsGo Mar 2023 #10
Yes!!! K&R !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t RKP5637 Mar 2023 #12
I wonder where the key is to wind them up? RKP5637 Mar 2023 #11
Russia has suffered massive losses LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2023 #24
Question 4 Tank experts: Is the T-55 Amphibious? Model35mech Mar 2023 #25
They are too heavy sarisataka Mar 2023 #28
Well I suppose the issue is can they cross rivers. Model35mech Mar 2023 #30
They can be fitted with snorkels I believe Kaleva Mar 2023 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Russia Appears to Be Depl...»Reply #25