General Discussion

ForgedCrank

(3,091 posts)

45. Sounds to me

Thu Mar 23, 2023, 08:14 PM

Mar 2023

like they are expecting us to believe a lawyer paid out $130,000 on a clients behalf out of the goodness of his heart, never expecting to be reimbursed.
Yea, that's totally believable. How could you even question that?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A wrench has been thrown in tRumps case with Stormy D..... [View all] a kennedy Mar 2023 OP

But but but ... tRump said ... n/t Marcus IM Mar 2023 #1

And sources sarisataka Mar 2023 #11

Speculation from the Daily Mail? Oh, please. Ocelot II Mar 2023 #2

not Daily Heil, it's RadarOnline, worse it's owned by American Media, owner of The National Enquirer Celerity Mar 2023 #18

Radar Online was using the Daily Mail as its source, so the story is doubly unreliable. Ocelot II Mar 2023 #19

fair point, the DM is pretty shite as well, RO and DM are a pair of jokers in the pack Celerity Mar 2023 #24

I thought I saw NJCher Mar 2023 #3

I saw an online image of a check. The image purported to be a check from 45 to Cohen. John1956PA Mar 2023 #12

I found a total of 7 images of checks made out to Cohen Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #27

here is one of the cheques Celerity Mar 2023 #20

They don't know shit. This is so ridiculous. It's all speculation. onecaliberal Mar 2023 #4

I'll wait for a better source FrankBooth Mar 2023 #5

I hear ya, and was skeptical myself.......just something to read while we wait for further news. a kennedy Mar 2023 #7

Please delete this OP. We don't need to read bullshit from a right-wing tabloid. Ocelot II Mar 2023 #9

++++ emulatorloo Mar 2023 #23

In that case, people shouldn't be posting stuff from Fox News, but I see it here all the time. BlackSkimmer Mar 2023 #29

Those, too. Ocelot II Mar 2023 #40

Radaronline is trash too blogslug Mar 2023 #15

Damn, ok then........thanks for this. a kennedy Mar 2023 #22

When it comes to gossip sites blogslug Mar 2023 #30

These may be gossip sites, but I've yet to see them have to rescind a story. BlackSkimmer Mar 2023 #31

That's right FrankBooth Mar 2023 #37

Anonymous source from the Daily Fail? FSogol Mar 2023 #6

source credibility NJCher Mar 2023 #8

Right....... a kennedy Mar 2023 #10

Neither the payment nor the reimbursement are the crime Ohio Joe Mar 2023 #13

+1 uponit7771 Mar 2023 #44

I can believe it Zeitghost Mar 2023 #14

Well inthewind21 Mar 2023 #26

That's a federal statute Zeitghost Mar 2023 #28

It's been reported that the clock stops when the person is out of state. Kaleva Mar 2023 #34

I've seen that arguement Zeitghost Mar 2023 #41

Somebody posted a link to the applicable law. Kaleva Mar 2023 #43

I think the NY statute NJCher Mar 2023 #33

When it comes to gossip, I would choose Trump over Radar.com any time. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #16

Given the number of half-truths, shadings, Retrograde Mar 2023 #17

Daily Mail is a crap rightwing source. I do not believe their "anonymous source." emulatorloo Mar 2023 #21

I guess we will see. BlackSkimmer Mar 2023 #32

Same here. Too many loose ends. And tfg seemed "okay" with it, which made me uncomfortable. nt allegorical oracle Mar 2023 #35

Their anonymous source could be Robert Costello or Rudy Giuliani. nt pnwmom Mar 2023 #39

If Cohen's attorney was a problem they would have recalled Cohen on Monday. dem4decades Mar 2023 #25

"They are having trouble convincing the jury to swallow the case"? Midnight Writer Mar 2023 #36

Truth is lots of powerful connected men pay hush money to mistresses Freethinker65 Mar 2023 #38

That letter was already discredited with checks proving Trump, Jr, and Weisselberg reimbursed Cohen wishstar Mar 2023 #42

Sounds to me ForgedCrank Mar 2023 #45