Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The angry Magat at my door. [View all]Ms. Toad
(38,469 posts)64. As a general rule, in the US each party pays its own way.
Making the losing party pay the other side's attorney fees is the exception, not the rule.
Defamation is pretty nuanced law. I'd never advise anyone to defend against a claim of defamation without an attorney. (That's not just protectionism - just the reality that some laws are more complex than others.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
K&R. You made it to "Trending Now" on the home page 😂, so maybe you'll get some suggestions /nt
progree
Mar 2023
#1
Paper trail, paper trail, paper trail. If you can get recordings or video that much better.
TheBlackAdder
Mar 2023
#66
Be carefull not answering the door. Often ppl looking to burgle a house will first knock on
2live is 2fly
Mar 2023
#54
Getting a ring camera will solve that and you can speak to whoever, whether home or not.
Bev54
Mar 2023
#57
Given the election involved, you make a good argument for your proposed steps
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2023
#13
I don't think it is up to the newspaper to fact check letters to the editor, they are opinion.
Bev54
Mar 2023
#59
I think if that was the case they would no longer have letters to the editor see below
Bev54
Mar 2023
#65
He wouldn't have to show financial damage. Damage to reputation, without financial damage is still
3Hotdogs
Mar 2023
#18
Good for you. If our experience with Trump shows nothing else, it's an unchecked bully escalates
Hekate
Mar 2023
#44
They use the threat of lawsuits for intimidation. Just like guess who.
Liberal In Texas
Mar 2023
#20
Coming on to someone's personal property and threatening them is NOT political free speech
Hekate
Mar 2023
#43
Do you plan to go to someone's front door and bellow at them? That is the main issue here.
Hekate
Mar 2023
#45
Document everything, record anything you can if approached again. Keep accurate records.
Timeflyer
Mar 2023
#24
You did the right thing in writing your letter and you have every right to express your opinion.
llmart
Mar 2023
#49
As long as they pay taxes that fund the schools I would think they are eligible
SYFROYH
Mar 2023
#55