Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Opinion: The Second Amendment is moot. Useless. Unnecessary. Repeal it. [View all]Smackdown2019
(1,358 posts)106. They had Headlines Shooting back then
As we have Headline Shootings today.
Differences is those Shootings back then were Gang on Gang or Gang on Police.
Today, SICK individuals shooting kids with Military grade weaponry.
We could control those Military grade weaponry by regulations, as the laws we passed in 1986.
I always said if you want to own a AR15, you would have it secured at a shooting range or gun club. Never taken off the premises, all transport of such of weaponry should be by a licensed arms dealer. That way, second ammendment would allow those they use the second ammendment as a right, has the right to own one, but with limitations. Perhaps a $10000. Tax on them would improve the want.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Opinion: The Second Amendment is moot. Useless. Unnecessary. Repeal it. [View all]
Roland99
Mar 2023
OP
That mechanism would like entail all out revolution and would not have a very happy ending for many.
Roland99
Mar 2023
#3
or it would allow red politicians to run the whole country no matter what when they have majority.
jimfields33
Mar 2023
#5
Do you really think that states would vote to repeal the 10th Amendment?
friend of a friend
Mar 2023
#63
Why not bag the whole "constitution" thing altogether? It keeps politicians from doing good, right?
Pete Ross Junior
Mar 2023
#6
I'm 79 and I still do a kill shot at 400 meters with my M-14 with iron sights.
friend of a friend
Mar 2023
#65
I never fired the M-16. I can't believe they didn't even have cleaning kits at first.
friend of a friend
Mar 2023
#68
Certainly not something that would probably even happen in the rest of my lifetime
Roland99
Mar 2023
#13
Well, I'm 75, so definitely not in the time I have left on Planet Earth,
MarineCombatEngineer
Mar 2023
#16
There's good reason to argue that it WOULD take a constitutional convention to repeal it
Bucky
Mar 2023
#102
Weapons that some posters like to call assault (that is how it is spelled) weapons
former9thward
Mar 2023
#103
Let's focus on real world solutions. Opening the Constitution to change will hand it over to maggots
NBachers
Mar 2023
#17
Multiple maggot states are already in line for a Constitutional Convention. The threshold isn't far
NBachers
Mar 2023
#34
whatever "militias" there are are not "well-regulated" and they want to kill US. Domestic terrorists
Evolve Dammit
Mar 2023
#19
The 2nd Amendment is a potential national suicide pact. It has allowed the RW to accrue hundreds of
Celerity
Mar 2023
#20
If the supreme court would rule that 2A is not for personal self defense, then there is no need
Jburt301
Mar 2023
#25
Funny how the right wingers are originalists except for when it comes to the 2nd Am. nt
SunSeeker
Mar 2023
#36
The message needs to be making it "safe" for law abiding gun owners to keep their guns.
cstanleytech
Mar 2023
#37
The 2nd is an amendment to our constitution just like prohibition was an amendment.
The Jungle 1
Mar 2023
#91
"The thing that has changed has been the culture. In the early/late 80's, guns were a tool."
Zeitghost
Mar 2023
#77